Bird Dragon | Bird Dragon

[Vangelios]

NAME: Bird Dragon ELEMENT: Life COST: 6 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6 | 3 TEXT: Bird Dragon:  Non-airborne creatures may not target this creature.  Gain +1/+2 for each 15 quanta in your pool.	NAME: Bird Dragon ELEMENT: Life COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6 | 3 TEXT: Bird Dragon:  Non-airborne creatures may not target this creature.  Gain +1/+2 for each 15 quanta in your pool.

ART: Khaleesi IDEA: Vangelios NOTES: SERIES:

[kaempfer13]

immune to spells?

[Vangelios]

immune to spells?

Not, immune just to non-fly creatures like Iridium, Squids, Nymphs.....

[kaempfer13]

Then its more like "creatures with abilities require the airborne passive to choose this creature as target"

[Vangelios]

Then its more like "creatures with abilities require the airborne passive to choose this creature as target"

Yes, but your text is too long, in card games this things need to be more simplified

[Monox D. I-Fly]

Why Life instead of Air?

[Vangelios]

Why Life instead of Air?

Lol  why  need helps to be a competitive element  but I agree with you should be more sense

[Naii_the_Baf]

Suggestion for description:

Bird Dragon can not be targeted by non-airborne cratures. Gains +1|+2 for every 15 you own.

Interesting. Basically, mixing  Wings,  Immortal, and the bolt mechanic?

Pretty cheap, at that. Maybe have it at 7/6 cost? Considering this is , though, maybe the creature is intended to be cheap.

[Manuel]

is an interesting mix of already existing abilities

if unupped gotp is 7/4 for 6  , toadfish is 6/4 for 5  , 6/3 for 6  and a very good ability should be fine for being in
maybe the upped one is cheap, but for 5  it will be pretty meh

[Espithel]

"Can't be targeted by non-flying creatures."
Or, alternatively:
"Can only be targeted by flying creatures."

15 quanta feels a bit excessive; I'd try 10.

[Vangelios]

"Can't be targeted by non-flying creatures."
Or, alternatively:
"Can only be targeted by flying creatures."

15 quanta feels a bit excessive; I'd try 10.

But "Can only be targeted by flying creatures." does the card OP because I can't use spells against.

[Mr Muffin]

If you compare upgraded bird dragon to other upgraded creatures that cost 3-5 quantum you'll find stat to cost wise upped bird dragon is weak. Then you take into account it's skill maybe it's too cheap. That's a big maybe because not too many decks have creatures based cc and the stat growth thing is weak. After finally taking account that it's a life creatures and life creatures are supposed to be have good stat to cost ratio in my opinion upped bird dragon has a perfectly balanced cost.