Antiparticle | Antiparticle

[nerd1]

NAME: Antiparticle ELEMENT: Other COST: 0 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: You lose quanta equal to a random number between one and six. Your opponent loses twice as much quanta.	NAME: Antiparticle ELEMENT: Other COST: 0 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: You lose quanta equal to a random number between one and six. Your opponent loses thrice as much quanta.

ART: nerd1 IDEA: nerd1 NOTES: none. SERIES: none.

[unknown89089]

If you have no quanta, what would happen? Would the enemy still lose any?

[nerd1]

If you have no quanta, what would happen? Would the enemy still lose any?

no, the minimum amount of quanta you can have is 0.

[ZephyrPhantom]

This card seems much better in Entropy considering the randomness.

I think I would rather use Black Hole/Discord/Pest as they are overall much better at the role of quantum denial. How is this card superior to any of the three?

Also, fix your title so it says "Antiparticle | Antiparticle".

[EmeraldTiger]

please fix the formatting.

[nerd1]

This card seems much better in Entropy considering the randomness.

I think I would rather use Black Hole/Discord/Pest as they are overall much better at the role of quantum denial. How is this card superior to any of the three?

Also, fix your title so it says "Antiparticle | Antiparticle".

entropy=possibly

please fix the formatting.

dont know how to modify title of topic. please help.

[ZephyrPhantom]

please fix the formatting.

dont know how to modify title of topic. please help.

There is a "Modify" button next to the "Quote" button on your post. Click that and you can modify your post title and info.

[Flayne]

Interesting idea, especially since its in "other". I reckon "other" needs more cards like these, that way a huge variety of strategies can be made, but i like this one, its pretty interesting, though its a little strong when rainbow VS mono.

[Nepycros]

Interesting idea, especially since its in "other". I reckon "other" needs more cards like these, that way a huge variety of strategies can be made, but i like this one, its pretty interesting, though its a little strong when rainbow VS mono.

Since it has no cost, it could be fit into any deck, regardless of its element.

[nerd1]

The reason I chose other as its type is because it has no cost anyways, and because it specifies random quanta it would be good for rainbows, as well as the fact that if this where ever made into a real card i wouldn't want any one team abusing it.

[Nepycros]

The reason I chose other as its type is because it has no cost anyways, and because it specifies random quanta it would be good for rainbows, as well as the fact that if this where ever made into a real card i wouldn't want any one team abusing it.

Only if a PvP event restricted usage of cards to mono, could you not use cards from other elements. Nova is a prime example of a card used in several non-entropy decks, has no cost, yet is affiliated with a single element.

[nerd1]

The reason I chose other as its type is because it has no cost anyways, and because it specifies random quanta it would be good for rainbows, as well as the fact that if this where ever made into a real card i wouldn't want any one team abusing it.

Only if a PvP event restricted usage of cards to mono, could you not use cards from other elements. Nova is a prime example of a card used in several non-entropy decks, has no cost, yet is affiliated with a single element.

if you really feel that strongly about the issue, i will set up a poll. if in three days 10 or more people voted and the consensus is to switch it to entropy i will change it.