Anti-Shadow | Anti-Shadow

[Kamietsu]

NAME: Anti-Shadow ELEMENT: Entropy COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: When Flown: -5|5 TEXT: Weapon. Deal 4 damage to the owner. Heal the opponent for 5HP  :Give Anti-Shadow to your opponent. Replaces opponent's weapon.	NAME: Anti-Shadow ELEMENT: Entropy COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: When Flown: -5|5 TEXT: Weapon. Deal 6 damage to the owner. Heal the opponent for 5HP  :Give Anti-Shadow to your opponent. Replaces opponent's weapon.

ART: Kamietsu, with art from Elements IDEA: Kamietsu NOTES: It will always hurt you and heal your opponent on the first turn it is summoned, due to summoning sickness. When you activate the ability, Anti-shadow will move to your opponent's slot, replacing any weapon they currently have. they won't be able to use the ability until their next turn due to summoning sickness. if the weapon is flown, and the ability is used, it will go into the opponent's weapon slot and not to their side of the field. When flown, Anti-Shadow no longer heals the opponent via the ability and instead by it's own negative attack. SERIES:

[OldTrees]

What happens when endowed by crusader?

seems a little [1-2 quanta] expensive for the effect. However I like the idea.

[Kamietsu]

Hmm, that is a good question. I suppose there are two obvious solutions.

1) Make Crusader move to the opposite side of the field.
2) Make Crusader die and the opponent gains an Anti-Shadow in their weapon slot.

[Werdbooty]

Would it get too confusing if Crusader simply filled the opponent's weapon slot with another Anti-Shadow?

Also, not to ruin a good name, but isn't anti-shadow, erm, Light?

[az4rel]

I think the atack should be -5 when flown as it heals the opp just like an antimattered creature.
so the crusader would gain -5 making it a -3|6 card that hurts its owner by 4.
as for the ability I prefer de second option but im not sure it surely could be confusing.

[Kamietsu]

Would it get too confusing if Crusader simply filled the opponent's weapon slot with another Anti-Shadow?

Also, not to ruin a good name, but isn't anti-shadow, erm, Light?

I think that might make Crusader a bit OP with it, since you'd always be able to replace their weapon.

And Anti-Shadow could be looked at as light. Anti- is a prefix meaning “against,” “opposite of,” “antiparticle of,” and while light is the opposite of darkness, and shadow is directly related to darkness, shadow is still slightly different than just darkness. A shadow can only be formed when there is something blocking the light source, not necessarily the absence of light. No light means no shadow, just darkness. So I've just swapped the positions of the shadow and the object casting the shadow. So instead of the object casting a shadow, the shadow is casting the object.

In all reality, I just combined Antimater and Liquid Shadow XD since that's basically what this weapon is.

[Werdbooty]

I think the atack should be -5 when flown as it heals the opp just like an antimattered creature.

This cleared it up for me

Now that I understand it a bit better - good idea!

[Kamietsu]

I think the atack should be -5 when flown as it heals the opp just like an antimattered creature.
so the crusader would gain -5 making it a -3|6 card that hurts its owner by 4.
as for the ability I prefer de second option but im not sure it surely could be confusing.

very good catch. I made a mistake in the tables and confused myself ^^; it's fixed now.