A small anti-rainbow card

[sillyking14]

oh yeah....whoops. sorry.

[918273645]

 Would the effect cease after another card of that type was played?

[Glitch]

I like the card.  It's basically a shield that doesn't take up the shield slot.  Does this stack?  Does it effect cards on your side of the field?

[bobcamel]

Would the effect cease after another card of that type was played?

Yes, as the creature gets a partner of its kind. Also, the effect would start if there were many cards of a type but then all but one died.

I like the card.  It's basically a shield that doesn't take up the shield slot.  Does this stack?  Does it effect cards on your side of the field?

The effect doesn't stack with itself.

In the first post, card description. Somehow, many people here can't read. Essence is an exception, and karma+ to him for that.

Yes, what Pilchard said. Type, not element.

As for the side dilemma, I was thinking about (c) when unupgraded and (a) when upgraded. Or just always (a) and cut some cost or add power on upgrade. Both sides' creatures can get insane.

Of course, this would remove the usefulness of the card from your Raynebow and make it useful just in decks where you'll be stocking multiple copies of creatures, but... well, it's sort of the point.

Okay, that is from the discussion, not first post, but... it's one page, you are supposed to read this.

[Boingo]

Solitude Insanity: Permanent (5 Darkness quanta)
If there is just one of the creature type on the field, the creature gets -1/-1 per turn. The effect doesn't stack with itself.

This seems like Fire shield except that it only affects lonely creatures and it removes 1 attack/turn in addition.  Not sure it's as good as Fire shield since the shield affects burrowed and immortal/immaterial creatures as well.   The advantage would be if you make the cost open to any element and not just as originally posted.  This would be a great addition to a or otyugh deck--the former for it's stackability with Fire shield to get the creatures off the field twice as fast and the latter for making more creatures accessible to devour sooner (and once devoured, any twin creature gets affected.)

[bobcamel]

inorite

maybe I should lower th...

3 any to summon, drains 1  per turn to work. Just splash it.

[Glitch]

I like the card.  It's basically a shield that doesn't take up the shield slot.  Does this stack?  Does it effect cards on your side of the field?

The effect doesn't stack with itself.

In the first post, card description. Somehow, many people here can't read. Essence is an exception, and karma+ to him for that.

Erg no, you misunderstand my question.  Emphatic bond and Vampire don't stack, meaning you cannot get healing for both.  Do poison and this stack?  Will it be a -1|-2 if the creature is poisoned?  Or does this trump poison?

You also haven't mentioned if it effects creatures on your side of the field yet.

Please don't get quite angry at us for our poor reading, as you seem to suffer the same affliction.

After some deep analysis, I found one flaw that Rainbow decks have, and created this card.

Solitude Insanity: Permanent (5 Darkness quanta)
If there is just one of the creature type on the field, the creature gets -1/-1 per turn. The effect doesn't stack with itself.


Namely, the flaw is... they often have just 1-2 of a creature type. 1 Illithid, 2 Otyughs, 1 FFQ, 1 Druid, and so on. This, while Mono decks have many copies of 1-2 creature cards, so they are unaffected, just when the enemoy doesn'tget them out fast enough or you control out the rest.

Comment.

[bobcamel]

Erg no, you misunderstand my question.  Emphatic bond and Vampire don't stack, meaning you cannot get healing for both.  Do poison and this stack?  Will it be a -1|-2 if the creature is poisoned?  Or does this trump poison?

Yes, sort of. At the end of your turn a check on all creatures is ran and ones not appropriate get -1/-1. Poison works as creatures take actions. Two independant things. Growth and other stat-modifying skills also work another time.

Permanent causes -1/-1 and this happens when permanents act on your side, and posion causes 0/-X where X is poison counters when the creature with poison takes action.

You also haven't mentioned if it effects creatures on your side of the field yet.

Does this card affect both sides independently of each other, or only one side, or both sides added?

So if there was only one FFQ on each persons field, would they both be affected(a), or only your opponents(b)? Or neither, because there's two out(c)? Personally, I think that it should do (a) when unupgraded, and (b) when upgraded. Just my thoughts.

As for the side dilemma, I was thinking about (c) when unupgraded and (a) when upgraded. Or just always (a) and cut some cost or add power on upgrade. Both sides' creatures can get insane.

Of course, this would remove the usefulness of the card from your Raynebow and make it useful just in decks where you'll be stocking multiple copies of creatures, but... well, it's sort of the point.

I did.

enemoy

Intentional.

doesn'tget

Oh, sorry for that. Fixing. Thanks.