Yeti | Yeti King

[majofa]

NAME: Yeti ELEMENT: Light COST: 5 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4|4 TEXT: Whenever this creature would be frozen, it gains +1/+1 instead.	NAME: Yeti King ELEMENT: Light COST: 7 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6|6 TEXT: Whenver this creature would be frozen, it gains +2/+2 instead.

ART: http://mostlymade.deviantart.com/art/Yeti-Doll-62407786?moodonly=24 IDEA: majofa NOTES: This effect can work multiple times per turn. SERIES: Mashup Competition

[Ruduen]

Far as I can see, the idea is sound, and is definitely a neat one. However, upgraded version might be a bit much with a couple of squids out.

Only huge comment I have is that it doesn't really seem to fit light. Not a lot of options with the element limitations, but still...

[TheIdioticIdiot]

well, this is a card that would make all water users who uses their annoying ice shield/permafrost shield for stalling want to cry...

[majofa]

Ya I like the concept lol

Yeti King may be a little overpowered, but at least it'd be fun to play right?

[xBerzerk]

Ya I like the concept lol

Yeti King may be a little overpowered, but at least it'd be fun to play right?

Fun to play, but still OP by far.

Rainbow deck + Arctic Squid + Fractal + Yeti King + Parallel Universe.
50 attack Yeti King what?

I like the concept. Maybe the ability could be changed to not resist the freeze, but still gain the attack.

[cookiepirate]

Ya I like the concept lol

Yeti King may be a little overpowered, but at least it'd be fun to play right?

Fun to play, but still OP by far.

Rainbow deck + Arctic Squid + Fractal + Yeti King + Parallel Universe.
50 attack Yeti King what?

I like the concept. Maybe the ability could be changed to not resist the freeze, but still gain the attack.

still getting frozen would be UP
the unuped one might be a little UP
the uped one is definetly OP, i suggest 5  , 6/6, gains +1/+1

[xBerzerk]

Underpowered? If I have 25 Arctic Squids and a load of , I can add 25 attack to this creature, resulting in 29 attack. The next turn, it gains attack and HP equal to however many water pillars I have divided by 3.

No, the entire idea is overpowered, but nice anyway.

[TheIdioticIdiot]

@xBerzerk, he meant this card would be UP if he is not immune to freezing

[Kuroaitou]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Fix the '/' in the ATK|HP section of the upgraded card table to a pipe symbol, or '|' (do not use '/' or slashes to separate the stats)

[majofa]

~fixed~

And in looking at this card more, I'm not sure if it's that OP. You'd have to spend lots of quanta to fuel it's power.
Also about fractaling Squids?? Why wouldn't you just fractal Abyss Crawlers?

[QuantumT]

I still fail to see how it's ability is OP. It's basically a conditional growth. The only way to make it grow faster than growth would be to have multiple squids on the field. The squids are fragile, and fueling multiples would be incredibly quanta intensive.

Growth- +2|+2 for 1 quanta
Antifreeze- +2|+2 for 3 quanta, requiring a fragile creature. Can be used multiple times a turn with additional fragile creatures.

[xBerzerk]

~fixed~

And in looking at this card more, I'm not sure if it's that OP. You'd have to spend lots of quanta to fuel it's power.
Also about fractaling Squids?? Why wouldn't you just fractal Abyss Crawlers?

Sure, it'd be costly, but say you DID have 100 or so . A fractal on a Squid, a dozen or so Water Towers, and you can "grow" the Yeti constantly each turn by 8 (or 16) attack/defense. That is an incredible growth. Fractaling Abyss Crawlers would be a one time thing. If you're working against an opponent that heals themselves constantly via SoG, Feral Bond, Miracle, etc, then a growth concept would work better.  But only in that case.

Keep in mind that this is only my opinion. Not like it affects how it will be voted for or accepted/denied into the competition. Just stating my views on its potential flaws.