Rosetta | Rosetta

[Mastermind79]

NAME: Rosetta ELEMENT: Time COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 5|4 ABILITY: Rosetta is affected normally by spells that target permanents.	NAME: Rosetta ELEMENT: Time COST: 5 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6|4 ABILITY: Rosetta is affected by spells that target permanents. : Rosetta becomes a permanent.

ART: Original Sculpture - Auguste Rodin http://media.kunst-fuer-alle.de/img/36/g/36_190968~_auguste-rodin_galatea,-1889.jpg http://www.kunst-fuer-alle.de/english/art/artist/image/auguste-rodin/217/44/107038/galatea,-1889/index.htm IDEA: Essence - http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,7299.0.html NOTES: If Rosetta is stolen, she goes to the opponent’s creature field. The ability is passive. For the Revive the Archive Card Idea Competition SERIES:

For clarification on becoming a permanent:
She moves to the permanents section. She cannot be targeted by CC. She can be targeted by PC. It works like Animate Weapon: No buffs are transferred, if there is no space, she is destroyed.

This also fulfills the niche of a midrange attacker for .

[Pineapple]

So by "affected normally by spells that target permanents" you mean "can be targeted as a permanent", right?

If you turn Rosetta(upped) into a permanent, does its skill change to "Rosetta becomes a creature"? If not, then I think that there isn't really a reason to turn it into a permanent...

Also, I think the unupped version could use the stats of the upped version (5 , 6|4) because as of now, it has the same cost/attack as mummy, but it's much easier to take Rosetta off the field with a 2 Deflagration, a 3 Destroy, a 3 Destroy, or a 4 Steal.

[Glitch]

There's a small discrepancy between the card and table.  The unupgraded card is called "Rossetta" but the table says Galatea.

[Kuroaitou]

CURATOR COMMENT

There's a small discrepancy between the card and table.  The unupgraded card is called "Rossetta" but the table says Galatea.

Pretty much this. Otherwise, I love the reworking of this card, and I hope that you make the changes soon despite it being in the middle of the holiday season. ^^;

[Mastermind79]

CURATOR COMMENT

There's a small discrepancy between the card and table.  The unupgraded card is called "Rossetta" but the table says Galatea.

Pretty much this. Otherwise, I love the reworking of this card, and I hope that you make the changes soon despite it being in the middle of the holiday season. ^^;

Thanks, I copied and pasted the original at first and then edited that. Fixed it.

Also, I think the unupped version could use the stats of the upped version (5 , 6|4) because as of now, it has the same cost/attack as mummy, but it's much easier to take Rosetta off the field with a 2 Deflagration, a 3 Destroy, a 3 Destroy, or a 4 Steal.

I thought about this for a while but I decided to keep it the same - imo has a better ability to get more quanta than , with sundials and hourglasses to stall and get more pillars out. This can also mean and synergy without using Graboid (EA will function as quint)

Thanks for the comments, I appreciate it.

[johannhowitzer]

EA is really the only reason you'd want your own creature to be targetable as a permanent - everything else is hostile.  is a decent combo for this with EA-"quint," but otherwise the mechanic works against you.

[Essence]

That said, this does a good job of being a mid-range attacker for , which is clearly not supposed to be a power-creature element.  (Unlike the original's element, which clearly is.)  I like this.

[johannhowitzer]

Except for Silurian Dragon, which is way up there... but yeah, this card does have about the same cost-attack ratio as Silurian.