[Official] Immortal | Elite Immortal

[Kurohami]

This card is massively underpowered, it's so obvious I don't even need to explain. I never saw anyone using it except in AI3 and AI5. Maybe there's a false god using it, but I'm not sure. (http://imageplay.net/)

How do I make a poll?

[MrBlonde]

I have to admit i kind of agree with this and i'm not really one to think many cards should be buffed. Maybe +1 damage to unupped and upped?

[kintar]

I don't see how it's so obvious that this card is underpowered. Mind explaining?

[Appawesome]

Immortal
6 quanta - 4 damage - immortal

Dragon

13 quanta - 8 damage - immortal


Which one is stronger??

[Progwolf]

Immortal
6 quanta - 4 damage - immortal

Dragon

13 quanta - 8 damage - immortal


Which one is stronger??

Immortal is not useful like the dragon.... especially in mono aether decks

[Kurohami]

For the dragon, the immortality actually matters, because it actually kind of hurt. But for immortal, it doesn't matter because it's damage is almost negligible and it has no ability. The immortality is pretty much wasted. And now, there are enough things that could kill immortal creatures already. Lastly, you almost never see them anywhere except AI3 and AI5, one is deck designed to be beaten the other is randomly generated decks. When nobody uses a certain card, it becomes evident that it's underpowered.

[xxxdeathxxx]

either lower its cost or add 1/2 damage to make it balanced

[jmdt]

Gemini uses these.

They do have a small place, helping mono aether decks get through gravity shields, but I agree that the need an attack boost to really be useful otherwise.

[918273645]

either lower its cost or add 1/2 damage to make it balanced

1/2? Zanz would have to recode the whole game, wouldn't he?

[Dragoon1140]

I would lower the cost to 4 | 5 respectfully.  At least at that point it would be a 1-1 cost-attack ratio.

[eh pewwwp]

Immortal
6 quanta - 4 damage - immortal

Dragon

13 quanta - 8 damage - immortal


Which one is stronger??

Immortal is not useful like the dragon.... especially in mono aether decks

Code: [Select]

61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61s 61s 61s 61s 61s 61t 61t 61t 61t 61v 61v 61v 61v 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 80d 80d
um what? they're actually very useful. in mono aether, you need to watch your  consumption, so 2 immortals have the same stats as the dragon, for 1 less  , which may look negligible, but makes a world of difference when you're tight on quanta, i agree that it needs a cost reduction, but the stats should stay the same

[PuppyChow]

Immortal
6 quanta - 4 damage - immortal

Dragon

13 quanta - 8 damage - immortal


Which one is stronger??

Immortal is not useful like the dragon.... especially in mono aether decks

Code: [Select]

61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61s 61s 61s 61s 61s 61t 61t 61t 61t 61v 61v 61v 61v 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 80d 80d
um what? they're actually very useful. in mono aether, you need to watch your  consumption, so 2 immortals have the same stats as the dragon, for 1 less  , which may look negligible, but makes a world of difference when you're tight on quanta, i agree that it needs a cost reduction, but the stats should stay the same

Ah, but if you replaced 4 of those immortals with 2 dragons + 2 pillars, the QI goes from 7 to 6.33. (Note that in both versions I replaced one of the immortals with a pillar to preserve the 2 immortals per dragon ratio).

Hence, taking 1 dragon and 1 pillar is better than taking 2 immortals.