[Official] Guardian Angel | Archangel

[Angelic_Dawn]

The Archangel is fine as is =).

But the Guardian angel could use a change.

My pennies/Suggestions:

1:Make it also Heal infect. (so no not poison. Infect <- )

2: Decrease the heal cost by 1 for Guardian Angel only. (And keep ArchAngel's abbility cost at  )
3: Make it do something completly diffrent then the ArchAngel, and allow Guardian a player heal only, (and not a Creature heal like the ArchAngel) (one for critters one for players)

4: Make Guardian 0/6 and heal creatures and/or players by 5 for  :           or such,
And keep the Archangel As is. (aka let them both have diffrent abbilties,  (why not? =p plenty of upped/unupped's are totaly diffrent =)

[ndclub]

Have long wanted them to injure death and darkness cards. Never quite figured out why they couldn't because not only does it fit the theme, its entirely balanced.

[Artois]

Have long wanted them to injure death and darkness cards. Never quite figured out why they couldn't because not only does it fit the theme, its entirely balanced.

Now theres a good idea, when Angel comes into play it could have a reverse eclipse effect... weakening darkness/death cards!

[Toxx]

Have long wanted them to injure death and darkness cards. Never quite figured out why they couldn't because not only does it fit the theme, its entirely balanced.

When I was new to this game I always thought Guardian Angel heal ability would hurt a  or  creature and  thought this for a good couples of weeks. It does fit the theme perfectly and since Holy Light damages them; I was thinking Guardian Angel just a weaker form of Holy Light. If the game was to do this though I feel it would nerf  and creatures 5 damage for one light quanta is a lot, it would make this card like Fire Nymph to these elements.

[ndclub]

I am still on the fence if the angels damaging death and darkness would be overpowered.(but it would create a purify situation, a card useful but only for a very specific situation other than nuking your own voodoo dolls) They hardly have any other use but on that same note I also feel that holy light should damage a player whos mark is death or darkness as well. Hard to believe that would be overpowered and actually make it seen slightly more.

[n00b]

Imo, Guardian Angel is fine as is... as for Archangel, now that's a nice little upgrade that you get if you spend the electrum. Fine as is, not OP, not UP (imo at least)

[Contrary]

Why are you guys suggesting such complicated stuff? Just up it's stats to like 3|8 or something.

[aqwsz0]

think of red nymph... combined with this... = pure damage, just no one tries it.

[RootRanger]

think of red nymph... combined with this... = pure damage, just no one tries it.

Lol, no one uses it because it's underpowered. It requires way too much quanta and card space for the amount of damage it does.

[aqwsz0]

think of red nymph... combined with this... = pure damage, just no one tries it.

Lol, no one uses it because it's underpowered. It requires way too much quanta and card space for the amount of damage it does.

3 red nymphs, 6 guardian angels,  13 fire towers 8 light towers light mark?

[RootRanger]

think of red nymph... combined with this... = pure damage, just no one tries it.

Lol, no one uses it because it's underpowered. It requires way too much quanta and card space for the amount of damage it does.

3 red nymphs, 6 guardian angels,  13 fire towers 8 light towers light mark?

That's a maximum of 54 damage for a deck with absolutely no shielding, healing, or even spells. And don't forget the minimum 1 turn delay.
Definitely underpowered.
If someone can actually make a decent deck with Guardian Angel that benefits from having Guardian Angel in it, I'll change my opinion that it badly needs a buff.
But so far I haven't seen such a deck.

[aqwsz0]

think of red nymph... combined with this... = pure damage, just no one tries it.

Lol, no one uses it because it's underpowered. It requires way too much quanta and card space for the amount of damage it does.

3 red nymphs, 6 guardian angels,  13 fire towers 8 light towers light mark?

That's a maximum of 54 damage for a deck with absolutely no shielding, healing, or even spells. And don't forget the minimum 1 turn delay.
Definitely underpowered.
If someone can actually make a decent deck with Guardian Angel that benefits from having Guardian Angel in it, I'll change my opinion that it badly needs a buff.
But so far I haven't seen such a deck.

how... what the... 54?