[Official] Firefly Queen | Elite Queen

[QuantumT]

Frankly, what used to be an iconic card for air has just fallen the wayside. It's basically never played outside of extremely limited formats, and there is a good reason for this. It's just too slow. By the time you get a queen up and running most rushes will have overrun you, and slower decks will just get rid of it.

[jmdt]

the card is currently just a bit slow to be competative.  Needs a slight cost decrease.

[PlayerOa]

Well, some FG-rainbows use it, like Skittles and CCYB (Not so much, but helps w/ Golems).
I think it's pretty balanced. Not every card needs to be a rush card

[RootRanger]

FG Rainbows use it because it is a good card for getting to 200 damage. It is too slow when your deck is trying to reach 100 damage.

[willng3]

Yes, cost decrease.  Even a -1 reduction would be fine.  It doesn't need to be a rush card, but it should be able to set up stalls quicker.  With the more recent game changes this card is just becoming more and more obsolete.

[DrunkDestroyer]

Well, some FG-rainbows use it, like Skittles and CCYB (Not so much, but helps w/ Golems).
I think it's pretty balanced. Not every card needs to be a rush card

FG decks use one or two. This card was made to have decks built around it. The ideal trio deck. Yet, how many do you see?

Maybe I'm just saying this, because I managed to lose to a creature spam deck using FFQ/Hope and Bonds in a tourney, but I'd like to see it recieve a light buff, just enough to make it competitive and awesome again.

[Zeru]

This card was not competitive when it costed 6 and it still had been nerfed. It is was a huge mistake, as it made the Queen almost unplayable.

[Newbiecake]

The buff is indeed needed. Like Zeru said, it was fine when it was 6  . This should help Supernova decks.

[MXXE]

Well, some FG-rainbows use it, like Skittles and CCYB (Not so much, but helps w/ Golems).
I think it's pretty balanced. Not every card needs to be a rush card

Don't use FG's as an argument when reasoning about cards!

Other than that: By being nerfed it was made unplayable. The nerf should be reverted. But I dont think buffing it even more after that will be really important because upcoming changes tend to make stalls stronger (shields being buffed, small creatures producing quanta unupped, cost decrease in flooding and arctic squid...), which will maybe again counter the currently to strong rushes.

[TheonlyrealBeef]

Well, some FG-rainbows use it, like Skittles and CCYB (Not so much, but helps w/ Golems).
I think it's pretty balanced. Not every card needs to be a rush card

Don't use FG's as an argument when reasoning about cards!

Other than that: By being nerfed it was made unplayable. The nerf should be reverted. But I dont think buffing it even more after that will be really important because upcoming changes tend to make stalls stronger (shields being buffed, small creatures producing quanta unupped, cost decrease in flooding and arctic squid...), which will maybe again counter the currently to strong rushes.

Fgs and anti-fg decks are two different things, in this case it referred to an anti-fg deck, and I think whether it's used in a(n anti fg) deck is very important, since cards that aren't used need a buff harder than those who are, since if they're used by players they apparently do have usage.

And zanz seems to balance based on overall usage (see card usage statistics).

[Essence]

This card was the victim of a totally brutal drive-by nerfing that did nothing to improve game balance. Put it back!

[kintar]

Like others have already said, at least undo the nerf. It's not like it was that powerful at 6 ...