ROYALTY
What i was looking here was a detailed image of characters/description of characters. But what i got was more of landscape and not much character. So points went evenly (nearly), and hence i see no point discussing this.
BARD
SSSSSSSSSSSSS: I quite like the idea. But perhaps its a bit much on funny side and not scary enough. That bug thing should be more scary...perhaps a choice of different colours would have helped here.
FROGS: As much as i liked it, it was a bit bland. Next art task, i want to see a bit more detail and a lot more happening in the image.
TTG: I really liked it. Ticked all the things. Well done. (deja vu?)
Pyro: Pixel is not really my thing (deja vu?), though i appreciate the art and the idea.
CRUSADER
One thing i wanna say - No point testing fully upped decks against ai3. Every upped deck will beat ai3.
FROGS: idk if i buy too much into the bribery thing. Good deck, but not very creative.
SSSSSSSSSS: I really liked it. Especially how fitting the descriptions were. Nicely done.
Pyro: Could have been more creative again.
TTG: Well explained, decent deck. Though i wonder what happens if goblins attack the squids and kill them?
ENCHANTER
One idea for teams is to have a sample deck with your cards too. Just a brief idea is sufficient too. Shows that you have put thought into how card can work with other cards in the game.
Pyro: I liked the spider, thought the manticore seemed OP. Masked crab seemed a bit UP, also not very original.
FROGS: Shapeshifter was a decent card. Balanced, but idk if i like the idea of a card summoning another card here :/ Pelican should have more hp, but apart from that, a nice way to give life cc (might have heard about a similar idea to this before though). Familiar - idk how it would work out. Too OP or not much use, not sure. Seems a little too simple though
SSSSSSSSSS: Hmm, i liked the mud lurker a lot and that boosted your points. Leaf flick seems a bit too strong, with lobo on stick costing 0 quanta. Stalkwing needs more hp to acc survive and be useful.
TTG: Good cards, good mechanic, like it.
Scribe
SSSSSSSSS: Eh, don't know if i like the idea of 1 para per creature.
TTG: I dont really like long stories. Though, thankfully, this one had a lot of dialogues and character interaction, so it was acc good, and got top marks.
Pyro: Dont know if i liked the idea of 3 seperate stories. Seemed a lot descriptive but a bit dull.
FROGS: Contrary to CO, i acc liked the fight scene. Though interesting to see how the team escapes now. Also, it was just the right length.
Wizard
SSSSSSSSSS: Simple and good. I would enjoy playing it. Though could have involved a bit more strategy.
Frogs: Seems too complicated and time consuming to set up. Not sure if possible to acc play in the situation.
TTG: I really liked the idea. Seems to be pretty fun too.
Pyro: I originally did like the idea and it was well written. Though, not much of a game. Perhaps involving someone to act out using the object with someone being a dragon and giving points to the best one, or just giving points to the most funny one (similar to CAH? ) would make it better.
Bard
TTG: Best submission. Though, i was only able to see it completely after zooming in. It didnt look like fire from a dragons mouth originally. May need a bit of tweeking.
Pyro: simple and easy to understand. I liked it however i can't see it as an icon. Bit too simple/bland for that.
SSSSSSSSS: The 6 is hard to see, need a stronger colour of blue. Also, i first thought that was sand, not gold XD
Frogs: the 6 is squashed up and i got no idea what the two things next to it are, pincer?
