Non Brawler Vote | Round 1 | by russianspy1234 |
|
Boss | Ragnarok | Red Stars | Artist | Red Stars | Meaning of life | CD | Frostbite | Life | DB | Gravy | Ragnarok | FE | *** | *** | OT | Red Stars | Frostbite | Writer | Gravy Train | Frostbite | Bonus | *** | *** |
|
These are gonna be fairly stream of consciousness, and the comments are basically the first things that jumped out at me. not necessarily the full reasoning.
Explanations:Boss Task:
The humor of meaning of life fell a little flat for me. Frostbites looks almost like a regular recipe with some human ingredients replaced with elements ones. This is a good thing IMO, though one instance of chicken ยป cockatrice was missed. Ragnarok: like the previous one, but better. instructions more akin to instructions for an elemental while still keeping the feel of a recipe. Red stars: ingredients seem more "elements like" but the instructions are more like a regular recipe. The result being a potion (multiples rather) is a nice choice. Gravy train: might be suffering from being the one I read last here. bonus points for using a holy cow.
Art:
Hard to give any concrete interpretations for this, especially since I'm not much of an art person. Given that it's abstract art, I'm grading them by how poorly I understood them, since that seems to be how abstract art is measured.
Card Designer:
Life: "Ship" seems like pointless obfuscation, but it is a way to due justice to the task (I'm assuming, having not seen this shipping myself). The ability is an interesting one, it's pretty hard to set up combos, but what comes out can be pretty interesting...
Frostbite: Interesting card. Creature's targeting effects are one of the more interesting aspects of the tactics in this game and messing with that dynamic is cool.
Ragnarok: I like the base concept, but the resetting the counter if you play more than one seems like a hack. I can't really think of a better solution though.
Reds: First thought of reading the card: Wow that's broken. First thought upon second reading of the card: Huh interesting... I could build a deck around this... First thought upon careful reading of the card: This is actually kinda weak. Next thought: I am now having trouble figuring out if you have to play the ability before or after you play the creatures, the wording is semi ambiguous, and I would lean towards after you play the creatures, but that would make it hard to combo with fractal which is what you implied you wanted in the notes.
Gravy train: Before I read the notes, I loved your card. There is no reason whatsover (either wording wise or balance wise) to make the opponent's spells not limited to the <6 aspect.
Deck:
Life: Not entirely sure what's going on here... Doesn't seem like mitosis would trigger either Annele's ability or have it's cost reduced by it...
Frostbite: Nice stall deck. That angelic card is pretty broken though... You'll probably win with it before the inevitable.
Ragnarok: It's SoSac, hard to build a bad deck...
Red Stars: This deck looks like a nightmare to pilot. I'd hate to have to plan around when I can and can't heal with SoSac in the deck. Almost seems like it would do more harm than good.
Gravy Train: Wow seems like a lot of convergent thought on this task... Gonna swing your way this time in part because I swung against your recipe
Forum Expert:
No votes. Nothing really jumps out at me and justifications would be flimsy at best.
Off Topicker:
Question, were the off topicker and writer tasks switched? Kinda seems that way...
Anyways, a little hard to say what I like best. Frosbite seems like they put the most work into theirs (as if that's possible to judge by the end result...) but the elements are a bit too... cemented into specific roles for my taste. I would also have liked to see mention of who gets along with who, etc.
Red stars managed to fit a nice amount of history of how a political system came about and the system itself into a fairly short space.
Writer:
Gravy train made me audibly laugh. Frostbite was pretty nice as well. Hurmor being really subjective can't give better explanation than that.