Hi team!I made this poll to see the opinion of everyone in relation with the way we are going to vote. The options are the following:
1) One for team, one for another.This voting politic comes from the belief that "The Brawlmasters gave us 2 votes in order to vote ourselves with the one and the submission we truly like with the other!" and "Every team is going to support itself, so why don't we do the same to keep the competition fair?".
Advantage: You support both your team and your favourite submission.
Disadvantage: You support your team even if it doesn't have a truly worthy submission and the ethics of this system are debatable.
2) None for team, one or two for another.This voting tactic supports the idea of "We can't be objective towards our submissions, but we can be objective towards other people's submissions!". We never vote for ourselves and we may cast 1 or 2 votes towards other teams.
Advantage: Fairplay and a good level of objectiveness.
Disadvantage: If our submission is the best, it is still not voted.
3) Pure manipulation.This strategy takes the "Every team is going to support itself, so why don't we do the same?" belief into another dimension. Any kind of manipulation is allowed in order to reach our divine goal of taking the 1st place and crushing our opponents without mercy, muhahahahaha! (In all seriousness, this is the LAST voting politic I would like to inherit.)
Advantage: Best winning chance.
Disadvantage: Ethics? Fairness? Objectiveness? What are all these alien words?
4) No voting at all.This politic follows the belief that "Only non-Brawlers should have the right to vote!" and "No FBrawl participant can be trully objective!" (and how can he/she be when such a cute forum icon awaits the winner, lolz!
) and demands for each team member not to vote at all, at any round, at any category.
Advantage: Lack of any voting unfairness.
Disadvantage: Less votes usually means less popularity for FBrawl.
5) Free will.
This ideology puts the will of the individual above the will of the team and allows anyone to vote as he/she please.
Advantage: Anyone votes the way he/she prefers.
Disadvantage: It may cause conflict between teammembers with very different views about voting politics.
I personaly vote for option 1 (one for team, one for another) and 2 (none for team, one for another). What is your opinion? Discuss and vote at the poll.