Brawl #1 - Round 4 [Voting Phase]

[furballdn]

Voters will be highly encouraged to take originality and potential winnability into consideration.

I have a feeling many voters aren't taking into account which result is better, but instead which is more flashier and colorful. That changes brawl to making the best writing or best thematic and playable deck into FLASHIEST~ and which the public likes. Now, there really isn't anything wrong with that since voters decide, but brawl voting should be based on those rules and not just which submission is the most pretty.

[Naesala]

Voters will be highly encouraged to take originality and potential winnability into consideration.

I have a feeling many voters aren't taking into account which result is better, but instead which is more flashier and colorful. That changes brawl to making the best writing or best thematic and playable deck into FLASHIEST~ and which the public likes. Now, there really isn't anything wrong with that since voters decide, but brawl voting should be based on those rules and not just which submission is the most pretty.

Suggestions on how to make voters vote the way they're supposed to?

[furballdn]

Calin's idea of screenies would be a great asset. Perhaps show the deck able to reliably defeat AI3 at the least, AI4 and PvP is better.

[ARTHANASIOS]

Voting fairness my ass!

Be polite. Civility in the face of a problem makes us more willing to listen and value your opinions.

I have censored my swear word.

Voting fairness my [censored]!

Ugh.

Sorry, Absol. I just don't find any reason of being polite any more. There are some things that have to be said, even if my language is not the best...

Some things need to be said? alright, my turn to say things.

Arthanasios,
On every darn round you keep always complaining about voting unfairness, yet you wont explain about it until the end. IF you don't want to explain your point would you please stop whining about it until you do it? Because, the way i see it, tell me if im wrong, this seems like a direct attack towards our team, like we are cheating or something. And I hate to be accused without proof.

ji412jo:
 First of all, I have never spoken against Nyan Sharks, my problem is with the voters, not with the teams. I have seen plenty of unfairness in the votes during the whole event. It has not to do with team submissions, it has to do with unfairness towards every single team. I know you don't like my opinion, but it is not only mine. Calindu, Absol, Opsinis, Werdboy and many more have a similar if not the same opinion, even if they prefer not to describe it publicly.

[Chapuz]

ARTHANASIOS:
Most of the voters don't know which team they are voting for in almost every task of every round. Correct me if I'm wrong. If I'm not, then the problem is with the submitions and not with the teams.

[UTAlan]

Let's please try to keep these threads on topic. I am sorry for everyone who had anything less than a great experience during Brawl 1. Please help us to constructively improve future Brawls by posting your concerns and suggestions in the Brawl Feedback thread. Thanks.

[OldTrees]

ARTHANASIOS:
Most of the voters don't know which team they are voting for in almost every task of every round. Correct me if I'm wrong. If I'm not, then the problem is with the submitions and not with the teams.

He is using unfair when I believe he means biased towards irrelevant details. (Like the Aesthetics of non Art submissions) Good voters would ignore these irrelevant details.

[ARTHANASIOS]

He is using unfair when I believe he means biased towards irrelevant details. (Like the Aesthetics of non Art submissions) Good voters would ignore these irrelevant details.

^
This. However, I think the amount of 'good' voters was minimal. I truly hope people will vote with more maturity in the next Brawl...