Scarab Deck Without Time Towers - Say What?

[Djhopper :)]

You only need one pharaoe to get the gameplan going.
And you first need a mummy before you can play a rewind on it.
So it makes sense to have one mummy more than a rewind.

What I'm saying is that just drawing a mummy is useless. Just drawing a rewind is, in fact less useless. The combo needs both at once.

Also, the deck has two extra mummies.

[Jangoo]

Oh ... well in that case you need two mummies more than rewinds to get the 85% win-rate against FalseGods. 

[I8SumOrangesNItWasK]

Eh, Mummies are good cards by themselves. Drawing one without an RT is not useless. It's a big part of the deck.

And something you failed to realize about my other deck, you don't need/get more than 1 or 2 pharoahs. Period. See, I thought was SO useless, I took out ALL my Time Factories. I bet that really irks you.

And I'm not going back on my claim of 85% win rate. You're not going to believe anything I say anyway, so I might as well leave it there for the people who DO listen and ignore all you haters who just keep bashing me because I apparently figured out a deck better than you can.

[Ekki]

And I'm not going back on my claim of 85% win rate. You're not going to believe anything I say anyway, *snip*

Would you believe me if I told you that if you added some stats (include which gods you defeated and how many times and some screenies), we would believe you?

And something you failed to realize about my other deck, you don't need/get more than 1 or 2 pharoahs. Period. See, I thought was SO useless, I took out ALL my Time Factories. I bet that really irks you.

Well, my whole argument was about the fact that drawing that 3-card combo is actually hard to do (not to mention you don't have 6xevery card in the combo), comparing it to a Chaos Power/Dune Scorp deck, which needs ONLY ONE two-card combo, but it still fails to do it in the first 2 turns (and sometimes you can't even play it before the FG's are set up/killed you).

[the_unknown]

i love scarab decks i love scarab spam decks even more, i just dont quite see a balance in quanta use.

[I8SumOrangesNItWasK]

i love scarab decks i love scarab spam decks even more, i just dont quite see a balance in quanta use.

As I said, it's fine with me if you all want to criticize this deck without trying it. It's your loss, not mine.

[Chapuz]

Of course it has 85% win rate against FGs!!!

*Playing in the trainer with 100 starting quanta*

[Plantifant]

i love scarab decks i love scarab spam decks even more, i just dont quite see a balance in quanta use.

As I said, it's fine with me if you all want to criticize this deck without trying it. It's your loss, not mine.

Why don't you just say the deck suxx against FG's.
I think we know it better than you...

[Djhopper :)]

i love scarab decks i love scarab spam decks even more, i just dont quite see a balance in quanta use.

As I said, it's fine with me if you all want to criticize this deck without trying it. It's your loss, not mine.

Mate, your tone is appalling. We come her to play, to have fun, not to find people to hate

If I tried every deck on this forum, I wouldn't have the spare time to post, eat or sleep. Don't think you deserve special treatment: People will try decks that they think look fun or good. They don't look at stats that have obviously been made up. They just play ones that look like there is a chance in hell that they will perform the claimed standard.

Calm down and, if 85% is really accurate, then post proof that this deck actually performs.

[ddevans96]

Since I have nothing better to do over Autumn Break, I'll try as many games with this as I can, hopefully 10+ for each god and 300+ total. 85% is such an imposing number in this situation, it's natural for people to be skeptical.

[I8SumOrangesNItWasK]

i love scarab decks i love scarab spam decks even more, i just dont quite see a balance in quanta use.

As I said, it's fine with me if you all want to criticize this deck without trying it. It's your loss, not mine.

Mate, your tone is appalling. We come her to play, to have fun, not to find people to hate

If I tried every deck on this forum, I wouldn't have the spare time to post, eat or sleep. Don't think you deserve special treatment: People will try decks that they think look fun or good. They don't look at stats that have obviously been made up. They just play ones that look like there is a chance in hell that they will perform the claimed standard.

Calm down and, if 85% is really accurate, then post proof that this deck actually performs.

I'm not the one acting hateful. I was trying to be nice, and share my deck with everyone. I'd accept constructive critcism but not a bunch of sarcastic "Oh, you're lying so who cares and shut up.". Seriously, grow up. If you don't have the time to use my deck yourself, then don't waste your time posting about it either. Just move on and let other people use it if they like.

[omegareaper7]

i love scarab decks i love scarab spam decks even more, i just dont quite see a balance in quanta use.

As I said, it's fine with me if you all want to criticize this deck without trying it. It's your loss, not mine.

Mate, your tone is appalling. We come her to play, to have fun, not to find people to hate

If I tried every deck on this forum, I wouldn't have the spare time to post, eat or sleep. Don't think you deserve special treatment: People will try decks that they think look fun or good. They don't look at stats that have obviously been made up. They just play ones that look like there is a chance in hell that they will perform the claimed standard.

Calm down and, if 85% is really accurate, then post proof that this deck actually performs.

I'm not the one acting hateful. I was trying to be nice, and share my deck with everyone. I'd accept constructive critcism but not a bunch of sarcastic "Oh, you're lying so who cares and shut up.". Seriously, grow up. If you don't have the time to use my deck yourself, then don't waste your time posting about it either. Just move on and let other people use it if they like.

You can't blame people for being skeptical. Especially when you claim 85% win rate which there is no current evidence of.