Fire Stall. I know, I wtf'ed, too.

[Uncle Jellyfish]

I suggest you to add 1~2 animate weapons.

Animate Weapons would work if I wanted the deck to kill quickly, but that is not the purpose of this deck. This deck is designed to win as often as possible, not as fast as possible. It's a quality of quantity type of deck, and as such, AW is not needed. Also, as Omegareaper7 pointed out, they would only clog the hand and take up valuable card space in the deck.

[Tea is good]

Wait, you were the one who was responsible for this? (Main reason why t50 farming isn't always good)

Anywho, I've found that a pa'ed fireshield and early SoGs mean more than early spell-based CC. I think Tretter has a version like that. If you asked him about that, this evil would gain ground.


Also, the quote about too many CLers playing this; I had a bunch of decks upgraded before I started grinding to make more pvp based stuff. I ran all speed rainbows and Lava Golems my first few matches.


Then I completely upgraded a mono-aether phase dragon/ phase shield deck. What does this say about what your deck has done to pvp?

[Uncle Jellyfish]

Wait, you were the one who was responsible for this? (Main reason why t50 farming isn't always good)

Anywho, I've found that a pa'ed fireshield and early SoGs mean more than early spell-based CC. I think Tretter has a version like that. If you asked him about that, this evil would gain ground.


Also, the quote about too many CLers playing this; I had a bunch of decks upgraded before I started grinding to make more pvp based stuff. I ran all speed rainbows and Lava Golems my first few matches.


Then I completely upgraded a mono-aether phase dragon/ phase shield deck. What does this say about what your deck has done to pvp?

You're about to hate me even more. I'm working on perfecting a newer version that will cover it's original weakness of early denial, without sacrificing any of it's survivability.

I wouldn't say that I developed the deck entirely, but I popularized it and made it better. When I first posted this deck, I knew it was good, but I had no idea that it would become so dominant (think back to Speed Poison....SG and I got that going, too, even though it's obsolete now).

[Guillaum3]

I've been using this deck against AI5 and it's extremely effective, most of your wins also come with EM which compensates for the longer matches.

Bonewall absolutely crushes this deck though as you only have one source of damage.

[Kjaska]

I've been using this deck against AI5 and it's extremely effective, most of your wins also come with EM which compensates for the longer matches.

Bonewall absolutely crushes this deck though as you only have one source of damage.

try saving 2-3 firebolts, if you're up against a bonewall

[Uncle Jellyfish]

I've been using this deck against AI5 and it's extremely effective, most of your wins also come with EM which compensates for the longer matches.

Bonewall absolutely crushes this deck though as you only have one source of damage.

try saving 2-3 firebolts, if you're up against a bonewall

This is another reason to use Fire Bolts/Lances. Bonewalls are a pain, and they can indeed drag a game out much longer than it was intended to be, but they are beatable if you use your DD spells sparingly. If you suspect that the opponent will have Bonewalls, then save some Bolts/Lances ahead of time, just in case.

[Jacky Nipper]

One of best mono decks, thumbs up.

[Uncle Jellyfish]

One of best mono decks, thumbs up.

I'm glad you like it. jmdt even told me once that "firestall > all" which needless to say made me proud, but also quite sad that the meta has started to revolve around it. =/ With the release of Sanctuary, unupped Fire Stalls are now viable, which makes them even more popular.

[omegareaper7]

In case anyone is curious, i'm taking stats on this for fake gods.

[aqwsz0]

-1 explosion
+1 RE?

[Pineapple]

-1 explosion
+1 RE?

With fire buckler, SoG, and 40 cards (you don't need to save all your bolts), it's not too hard to CC scary decks to death to deck them out, while you only need an early fahrenheit and 2-3 bolts so it's rare you'd need that much CC.

[Uncle Jellyfish]

-1 explosion
+1 RE?

With fire buckler, SoG, and 40 cards (you don't need to save all your bolts), it's not too hard to CC scary decks to death to deck them out, while you only need an early fahrenheit and 2-3 bolts so it's rare you'd need that much CC.

This. ^

The Explosions are almost required to deal with troublesome permanents, such as an opposing Fire Stall's SoG's, a Pulvy, Sanctuary, etc. They can both save you and kill the enemy faster. There is enough CC in here already that an extra single target CC like RE would be rather useless.