Skeleton Regent | Skeleton King

[Rainbowz]

I like this and think it would be a very good add to elements.

[Xelax]

I just happened to stumble across this thread as I stumbled through the forums. If only you'd advertised this idea a bit better Jmdt, maybe told people about it in the chat! xD

Anyways, I think it's a nice idea- works well with other cards- good synergy with Boneyard, etc like sSethia said. I know it's pretty much obvious, but you should probably say 'Where N is the number of skeletons on the field'- cards like Scarab show it's necessary or people might get confused and start crying.

Nice art and like the skill as well.

Actually, quick idea- People don't tend to *like* having skeletons on their side. They're defeated easily and owned by all shields. Considering you'd need your field *full* to have a high attack from the Regent, you could view this as an actual disadvantage, i.e it's not worth using the Regent because of the obstruction having the skeletons cause. Would saying N is equal to *all* skeletons on both fields.

Whadaya reckon?

[sSethia]

I just happened to stumble across this thread as I stumbled through the forums. If only you'd advertised this idea a bit better Jmdt, maybe told people about it in the chat! xD

Anyways, I think it's a nice idea- works well with other cards- good synergy with Boneyard, etc like sSethia said. I know it's pretty much obvious, but you should probably say 'Where N is the number of skeletons on the field'- cards like Scarab show it's necessary or people might get confused and start crying.

Nice art and like the skill as well.

Actually, quick idea- People don't tend to *like* having skeletons on their side. They're defeated easily and owned by all shields. Considering you'd need your field *full* to have a high attack from the Regent, you could view this as an actual disadvantage, i.e it's not worth using the Regent because of the obstruction having the skeletons cause. Would saying N is equal to *all* skeletons on both fields.

Whadaya reckon?

Well people don't like having skeletons on their side because they don't really help. With this card in play, however, skeletons actually serve a purpose. Skeletons are actually pretty strong when combined with Eclipse. (4|3).

[jmdt]

Well people don't like having skeletons on their side because they don't really help. With this card in play, however, skeletons actually serve a purpose. Skeletons are actually pretty strong when combined with Eclipse. (4|3).

If you could some how manage this card, 22 skeletons, and eclipse on the field that would be 22 4/3 critters and this card at 15 damage for a total of 103 damage.  Eclipsed skeletons are nothing to scoff at.  However pulling this off in practice wouldn't be quite so easy, as it would take several turns and several cards to set up and PC and CC will greatly affect this combo.  It would be fun to try though.

[ratchetspyro94]

Well people don't like having skeletons on their side because they don't really help. With this card in play, however, skeletons actually serve a purpose. Skeletons are actually pretty strong when combined with Eclipse. (4|3).

If you could some how manage this card, 22 skeletons, and eclipse on the field that would be 22 4/3 critters and this card at 15 damage for a total of 103 damage.  Eclipsed skeletons are nothing to scoff at.  However pulling this off in practice wouldn't be quite so easy, as it would take several turns and several cards to set up and PC and CC will greatly affect this combo.  It would be fun to try though.

I would use this card alot if it was made cause it would be fun using it since my favorite element is Death.      See My Evilness HAHAHAHA!!!!!!

[Higurashi]

Well people don't like having skeletons on their side because they don't really help. With this card in play, however, skeletons actually serve a purpose. Skeletons are actually pretty strong when combined with Eclipse. (4|3).

If you could some how manage this card, 22 skeletons, and eclipse on the field that would be 22 4/3 critters and this card at 15 damage for a total of 103 damage.  Eclipsed skeletons are nothing to scoff at.  However pulling this off in practice wouldn't be quite so easy, as it would take several turns and several cards to set up and PC and CC will greatly affect this combo.  It would be fun to try though.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,7536.0.html
It's already a viable FG deck. :>

[ratchetspyro94]

Well people don't like having skeletons on their side because they don't really help. With this card in play, however, skeletons actually serve a purpose. Skeletons are actually pretty strong when combined with Eclipse. (4|3).

If you could some how manage this card, 22 skeletons, and eclipse on the field that would be 22 4/3 critters and this card at 15 damage for a total of 103 damage.  Eclipsed skeletons are nothing to scoff at.  However pulling this off in practice wouldn't be quite so easy, as it would take several turns and several cards to set up and PC and CC will greatly affect this combo.  It would be fun to try though.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,7536.0.html
It's already a viable FG deck. :>

Nice im thinking about making it.

[jmdt]

So do you guys think this card is more OP or UP as is?  This card seems underpowered at first glance, but can also become extremely powerful under the right circumstances.  It's pretty good already, but I'm trying to find the best cost/stats balance for this card.

[7_Deadly_Sins]

I think this card is perfect because it takes a lot of different cards to make it work well. Boneyard,Eclipse, Plaugue or any creatures that die when you summon them i.e sparks.

[guolin]

He had to choose between 2 pictures that we given to him on Kongregate. He had t choose from the picture thats on the card now and my picture...

http://cghub.com/files/Image/013001-014000/13467/115_realsize.jpg

He choose the other 1 because mine was to big. But the card looks AMAZING!!!!!!

It's called cropping and resizing...?

[ratchetspyro94]

So do you guys think this card is more OP or UP as is?  This card seems underpowered at first glance, but can also become extremely powerful under the right circumstances.  It's pretty good already, but I'm trying to find the best cost/stats balance for this card.

It neither UP or OP to me. I love it. I would use it if they made it into a card.

[ros123]

I really like this card jmdt. If it becomes a real card I might just have to make a death deck for it!