Shadow Storm | Midnight Storm

[Cheesy111]

I'm worried that a "storm" of shadow doesn't really fit darkness as an element, and makes it sound too similar to rain of fire, especially with a similar effect.  It seems a bit too homogenous for a game where a lot of emphasis is put on the differences between the elements.  While I agree that Elements needs more mass CC, I'm not sure this is the right way to go about it.

[Aves]

While there is a difference that has to be maintained, there's also sets of related cards. This would make the 'bolt' set expand and create a 'storm' set; its not an implausible idea.

Why does this remove invisibility, though? It's a card and thematically, how do shadows detract from the cloak of night?

[Xenocidius]

Why does this remove invisibility, though? It's a card and thematically, how do shadows detract from the cloak of night?

It removes invisibility because all mass CC removes invisibility. Although now that you mention it, it would probably make more sense for it not to.

[Chapuz]

Why does this remove invisibility, though? It's a card and thematically, how do shadows detract from the cloak of night?

It removes invisibility because all mass CC removes invisibility. Although now that you mention it, it would probably make more sense for it not to.

Mass CC removes invinsivility? O_O I think fire storm, panda and plague don't...

[Jenkar]

Why does this remove invisibility, though? It's a card and thematically, how do shadows detract from the cloak of night?

It removes invisibility because all mass CC removes invisibility. Although now that you mention it, it would probably make more sense for it not to.

Mass CC removes invinsivility? O_O I think fire storm, panda and plague don't...

Wrong x3

[UnderneathTheLens]

I'm worried that a "storm" of shadow doesn't really fit darkness as an element, and makes it sound too similar to rain of fire, especially with a similar effect.  It seems a bit too homogenous for a game where a lot of emphasis is put on the differences between the elements.  While I agree that Elements needs more mass CC, I'm not sure this is the right way to go about it.

Yea.. I don't really think the name fits. How about Vampiric Aura or something?

[KiLLjoY]

Isn't it a bit... redundant, having that massive CC card? I mean: Fire has a massive 3 damage mass CC, Death has a massive poison, Entropy has pandamonium... I think that with more cards like this, All elements will be basicaly the same.

Exactly my thoughts!
Air has Thunderstorm which deals 1 dmg, Fire has Fire Storm which deals 3 dmg,
imo we dont need another CC card that deals 2 dmg and i don't think it goes well with the element darkness.


sry, but no. =/

[dreadwoe]

1)epic image
2)captures essence of darkness in stealing life
3)darkness needs large targeting area
4)unique as far as i've seen

Congrats on the card i hope to see it in level 4 someday

[freemod1espilon]

Finally a more practical way to eliminate Rol/Hope decks and even easier to Em      May rule for at least a day

[Drake_XIV]

Finally a more practical way to eliminate Rol/Hope decks and even easier to Em      May rule for at least a day

Uh, it's just as practical as Rain of Fire, so I don't see where the "more" is coming from...

[Aves]

already had fire shield to get around Hope. This gives mono a shot at it.

[UnderneathTheLens]

already had fire shield to get around Hope. This gives mono a shot at it.

Well, already has every type of control but mass CC.