Luminiferous Aether | Luminiferous Aether

[billyjames]

i think its a great card and if you would want to nerf it just change it to light instead of aether, that means its more light soo you would have to have a duo aether light to use a fractalling ball lighting deck. But its good as is and i think it would work really well.

[EvaRia]

Now I just find it slightly amusing that like EVERY PERSON WHO POSTS HERE makes some kind of comment on possible nerfs ><
Seriously, IT'S NOT OP. IT'S SLIGHTLY UP. It generates ZERO COST CREATURES.
Even if it generates a ball lightning EVERY turn, that's essentially just a 5 atk creature for  and  per turn! How is that OP?

[Bloodshadow]

i think its a great card and if you would want to nerf it just change it to light instead of aether, that means its more light soo you would have to have a duo aether light to use a fractalling ball lighting deck. But its good as is and i think it would work really well.

PLEASE DO NOT COME HERE AND SUGGEST POSSIBLE NERFS. THIS CARD IS NOT OVERPOWERED.

This will be added to the first post.

[miniwally]

should cost to play... Just joking.

I can't see this as being OP anyway especially considering light and aether don't have any synergy's anyway except they both have 0 cost creatures which here you have to pay 1 light to activate.

[EvaRia]

Anyone gonna second me?
I think this card needs a buff, not a nerf.
It's ability to generate zero cost creatures is pretty fail expensive as of now, it is simply better to have the creature in your deck.
Like I said, even if you get the almighty damage of ball lightning every turn, that's just basically a 5 attack creature for 7 and 1 per turn.
I personally think it should cost around 4 .

[guolin]

Yeah, I still don't see why people keep screaming fractal + BL. I mean, seriously - why the hell would you want to pay 7 and 1 instead of just...free? (not counting Fractal's cost, either) The only way I can see this used a lot is in a Blessings deck or maybe a trio with Bone Walls/Vultures/w/e.

[miniwally]

I don't think it needs a buff cause this keeps making them where as this has unlimited amount where as normally you can only have 6 of each.

[slovenc555]

Well, this is OP, but only because free cards cost 1 .  . What more on would call this OP? I mean, it generates a low health/dmg producer and a short lived 5 dmg thingy when UPGRADED!!! I love it. I think that this card could partially replace fractal in rol/hope decks. Ley's just hope that armory gets a new card!

[EvaRia]

Lol, people say it's OP cause of fractal?
I say it's UP because of fractal.
For it's price, fractal handles the >6 cards better.
It's that simple.
Generating a ball lightning every turn is just a very costly 5 atk creature, and generating RoLs isn't that use full at all until you get like 7 out. Fractal is much quicker and has the ability to send out burst damage. That's why I think the cost should be lowered, it simply is too costly for how slow the effect is.

[Bloodshadow]

I suppose I can lower the cost, but should I? The card is already in Armory, and I'm not sure if it could be here if it had a lower cost.

[KorabanVII]

Yikes, big red text. I don't think the card should be nerfed.
I think it should cost  6 instead of 7. 5  instead of 6
7 and 1  for zero cost creatures....
Yeah that's what takes the FGs down huh. Overpowered my asphalt.

[Fallower]

xD
OPed comments happen so frequently~

I can only see this working well with ROL hope...