Wings | Wings

[genraenera]

It seems to me that ground creatures should have a 25% chance to hit.  Ground creatures (I'm assuming) would be able to jump and try to hit through the shield, but have only a small chance of success.  This would stop the shield from being completely OP, while also not ruining its usefulness.

[BluePriest]

It seems to me that ground creatures should have a 25% chance to hit.  Ground creatures (I'm assuming) would be able to jump and try to hit through the shield, but have only a small chance of success.  This would stop the shield from being completely OP, while also not ruining its usefulness.

Have yo'u tried FG farming with a deck built around it, like decks built around Hope? Its not nearly as powerful as hope.  personally think its too weak and shouldnt be able to be destroyed since its only temporary, unlike hope which stays on the field.

[finkel]

@bluepriest: Except if your opponent has lots of spiders that you can't get rid of, and he webs all your creatures, he has access to 30 turns of near-invincibility (except spells and weapon), so I'd rather it be more like bonewall than dim shield, if it were different at all.

[Arondight]

After testing it out and losing lots and lots of score against people and AI. I have to again say that I think it should be Immaterial and agree with the rest saying that it needs to be. Too much of a weaker version Phase Shield. Even if you have spiders on the field, attacks still go through before you might be able to web them. "Might" because they're so squishy.

[Ant-n-ero]

After testing it out and losing lots and lots of score against people and AI. I have to again say that I think it should be Immaterial and agree with the rest saying that it needs to be. Too much of a weaker version Phase Shield. Even if you have spiders on the field, attacks still go through before you might be able to web them. "Might" because they're so squishy.

this is why they invented the elements trainer >_< doh!

[miniwally]

He couldn't have tested vs people then though.

[Ant-n-ero]

but if the AI side looked good then he could have built it then, rather than build it then test it for 'real' money

[Arondight]

First, thanks for your patronization. I already had sufficient cards and upgrades to test it out against both AI and people. The main part was against "people." It was all for the testing of the card in terms of how well it would actually perform, you're simply missing the real point of the post.

[Brion]

i already used it in a deck, its very usefull not keeping in mind that it is really annoying if someone gets a dragon out when you got like 10hp... still i love to use this card

[BluePriest]

@bluepriest: Except if your opponent has lots of spiders that you can't get rid of, and he webs all your creatures, he has access to 30 turns of near-invincibility (except spells and weapon), so I'd rather it be more like bonewall than dim shield, if it were different at all.

Which requires you to splash vulnerable cards + multiple elements to get a shield to 100% effectiveness.

phase shield=100% effectiveness and 1 element for 3 turns.
wings = About 70% effectiveness, and if you want 100% effectiveness you have to splash spiders from another element, use another ability, and be able to use web as often as your opponent lays monsters.

[OKIGorgon]

How about an idea to use wings to fly (maybe 10 , so it won't be too cheap) and be out of reach of non-flying enemies for 1-2 turns (and then maybe 1 turn to rest, before you can use it again)?

[dragonhuman]

hmm the card needs to be fixed to say that its a shield

but wait, wut if It wasn't a shield? then itd be well balanced as you would still have your fog shield to block those that get past