Air Deck

[TheIdioticIdiot]

DD, that deck fails against L5s and FGs. It holds up slightly against L3s with a 50/50 ratio of win/loss.

of course it fails against FGs and L5s... they are no slouch you know....

as for AI3, they recently received deck changes, and are much stronger now... almost all older decks made for AI3 have lower win rate and/or EM rate now

[Asmius]

That deck was made recently, TII. It's not a year old deck or something.

But yeah, rant neccesary. I was just testing it to see.

[DrunkDestroyer]

That deck was made recently, TII. It's not a year old deck or something.

The AI3s are even more recent. This batch is much more control-orientated (and IMO well built) than the last batch was.

[MyLeftCheek]

I would take out the fireflies for something like pegasi, for some extra damage. Just as a thought, though, as you might get short on air quantum later on.

well  now those are wyrms not fire flies and this is the deck like this and if any dif its not the deck okay deal with it

[Dm]

I would take out the fireflies for something like pegasi, for some extra damage. Just as a thought, though, as you might get short on air quantum later on.

well  now those are wyrms not fire flies and this is the deck like this and if any dif its not the deck okay deal with it

1 - Part of your sentence is too hard to understand - I'll skip it and notice it for you.

2 - My comment is from VERY, VERY, VERY LONG AGO. As in, when I MADE that suggestion, the deck was with Fireflies. He edited the deck and the post and changed them for Wyrms. If you didn't see the first deck, you won't understand.

[Asmius]

Fear not, DM. I speak noob.

I believe he was trying to say:

"Well, now those are wyrms. There are now fireflies. This is the deck, and if it's any different, deal with it, ok?"

Good?