Look Ma! No rares! [water]

[furballdn]

wait, you have 6 water nymphs?

I think he meant 6 Nymph's Tears.

That being said, major +rep on this deck, seeing as it's one of most simplistic yet strong decks for Mono-water. It sucks against heavy CC/quanta denial, but even then, the fact that it only requires 6 spells (the rest being pillars and pendulums (or even Marks of Water >.>) ) is quite awesome. This will be added to the Nymph's Tears article in the wiki.

Thanks!


Also on topic: Marks of water would give random nymphs wouldn't they? Since marks count as other cards. It wouldn't be all water nymphs, and that would reduce the effectiveness since there's no SoR to make use of other nymphs' abilities.

[Wizy]

Also on topic: Marks of water would give random nymphs wouldn't they? Since marks count as other cards. It wouldn't be all water nymphs, and that would reduce the effectiveness since there's no SoR to make use of other nymphs' abilities.

Yea marks create random nymphs when targeted with tears, also they would have to be upped marks, since unupped ones stack on the mark slot becoming untargetable.
Even if someone has 6 upped water marks (I doubt), for a tears/randomness/SoR deck IMO it is more effective to use QT for paying the shards and sometimes using non-zero cost abilities.

[UndeadSpider1990]

This is without a doubt THE most one-dimensional deck in the world... AWESOME!!!!

Am I to understand the Queens were initially buffed to 7/9 then? I guess Zanz was listening

[furballdn]

This is without a doubt THE most one-dimensional deck in the world... AWESOME!!!!

Am I to understand the Queens were initially buffed to 7/9 then? I guess Zanz was listening

Haha yep. They were 7|9 before, now they're only 6|7. Shame