Sundial | Sundial

[RavingRabbid]

Sundial... buff...




ò_ò

[Ryli]

I like it. It's better than it was, but isn't broken like the very old sundial.

[nerd1]

Sundial... buff...




ò_ò

agreed
              _________
             /                  \
           /     {}  {}       \
           \                      /
            l       +++       l
            l __________l
weirdest buff I've ever seen, needed, but weird, cause it used to be one of the cards in the game where NOT nerfing it would have been incredibly stupid.
o well....

[Ruduen]

*Flashbacks to old sundials*

That being said, I like it. I'm not sure if it feels completely necessary, but it gives sundials a little bit more flexibility when they're upgraded.

[BluePriest]

I dont think upgraded sundial ever got noticed. It was hardly ever used. there were a few decks, but I hardly noticed any. The automulligan taking it just sorta crippled the card. No one wants it in their opening hand INSTEAD of a pillar. And the 2  was a big drawback. This got rid of 1 of the problems, but I think the major one was that it could be taken by the automulligan.

[Daytripper]

Oh, great. I felt like a bit of a retard with 6 upped sundials that were worse, rather than better than regulars. An upped version shouldn't ever be worse. Only a new variation can be defended. (Take the toadfish, which is totally different.)

[Marvaddin]

In fact, upped Sundial wasnt worse than unupped. It was a variation that could be used by decks that didnt have time quanta. But now its really better. Looks like I will need 9k to up my Sundials

[Rainmaker]

auto mulligan REALLY screws this.

[Ryli]

auto mulligan REALLY screws this.

The problem is the same as before then. I only see advantages in this buff.

[Rainmaker]

Thats my point, unupped is better, as you don't get to draw a sundial on your first 7 card hand.
The only benefit now is that MOST decks that have quanta generating can play it to search for their decks for specifics.
MAYBE, they should make it cost 1 to play. That would prevent it from appearing into the 1st hand.

[xdude]

I wish you could all act like 0 cost is a bad thing. Before, people lived without mulligan perfectly. They, you know, added Towers to their decks. You should try the same before complaining that a certain 0-cost card screwed your draws 5 times in a row.

[BluePriest]

I wish you could all act like 0 cost is a bad thing. Before, people lived without mulligan perfectly. They, you know, added Towers to their decks. You should try the same before complaining that a certain 0-cost card screwed your draws 5 times in a row.

Except now people plan their decks with the automulligan in mind. 5 tower builds werent as possible as they are now.  the whole point of automulligan is to draw a tower on the first hand and not some other card, and a card being 0 cost messes that up.