Rockefeller theory

[OldTrees]

Some believe evidence suggests that rockefeller was being bribed by the shah when he was in America getting cancer treatment.

1) There were too many qualifiers in that statement for it to retain credibility as presented here.
2) If that were considered evidence it would be an investigation of whether the Shah was bribing Rockefeller not an accusation of Rockefeller murdering the Shah. Such an accusation would require more evidence.

[hainkarga]

What evidence do you speak of ? This is not a transparent simple math equation. You guys are talking about one of the elite families who own the world and control all its money (really all dollars belong to FED, aka rockefellers). And you think the most powerful people in the world are stupid enough to give the public open & clear evidences of their crimes ? And you think they don't control the media & justice system already ?
Even if you knew or heard nothing of the rockefeller stories, only extremely naive people could manage to believe they are an innocent bunch.

[OldTrees]

There is a difference between believing something and accusing someone. I ascribe to the innocent until proven guilty system of justice because I prefer criminals on the street over innocents on the chopping block. This does mean that there needs to be evidence (perhaps a communication) prior to the accusation. Remember even the very rich can and have been convicted of crimes using our legal system. I think you should be very careful before changing to the witchhunt system of justice.