isnt it suppose to say double, and not dopple? BTW i like the card... I really dont see it being used very much, although it would give procrastination a boost I suppose. I actually think its cost is too high to summon the creature though.
is it possible to double the delay on one creature more than once?
Quote from: BluePriest on May 26, 2010, 01:09:45 pmisnt it suppose to say double, and not dopple?Oops, i forgot to correct the mistake.
isnt it suppose to say double, and not dopple?
Quote from: Schattenfresser on May 26, 2010, 01:52:44 pmQuote from: BluePriest on May 26, 2010, 01:09:45 pmisnt it suppose to say double, and not dopple?Oops, i forgot to correct the mistake. Still not fixed on the card.
Quote from: BluePriest on May 26, 2010, 01:09:45 pmisnt it suppose to say double, and not dopple? BTW i like the card... I really dont see it being used very much, although it would give procrastination a boost I suppose. I actually think its cost is too high to summon the creature though.This spelling is still on the main Time card crucible page, just FYI