Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5v2 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 61o 61o 61o 61r 61r 61r 61r 61r 61t 61t 61t 61t 61t 63a 63a 8pu
When I first saw the darkness mark, I immediately thought of Adrenavamps, hoping it would be in my favor to PU them for an easy win. It turned out to be quite different.
Game 1: PU Devs vs. Pestosis. He won. Never got a dragon out, dim shields were dead cards when I had the quanta to play them. By the time he got dragons out, I had no quanta. Also would have lost by deckout as well. We both started out poorly with quanta, but his runs on much less.
Game 2: PU Pestosis vs. Pestosis = my win. I had PUs to counter the
![Darkness :darkness](https://elementscommunity.org/forum/Smileys/solosmileys/../../../images/Misc/darkness18x18.png)
drain, and PU'd his mito-dev, which, with extra pends for more
![Darkness :darkness](https://elementscommunity.org/forum/Smileys/solosmileys/../../../images/Misc/darkness18x18.png)
, allowed me to bit-by-bit get out dragons for the kill.
Game 3: I had a pretty good starting hand, lots of pends, and mostly what I remember from this match really are these snippets of in-game chat: "Good game" I said, presumptuously. (I had two dragons out, and he had just been brought down to 20 hp). Mathman played a random Bond out of nowhere, saying "not yet". I PU'd my dragon, saying "How about now?
![Tongue :P](https://elementscommunity.org/forum/Smileys/solosmileys/tongue.gif)
" His bond did not take him back above 30 hp to survive, so I won.
Game 4: He never drew any pends or mitosis. I had a PU'd dragon out nearly as fast as it's possible to with this deck, and 5 turns later he was dead.
Never drew the lone cloak, and it wasn't necessary.
Good games Mathman
![Smiley :)](https://elementscommunity.org/forum/Smileys/solosmileys/smiley.gif)