Avalanche | Avalanche

[Daguerreo]

NAME: Avalanche ELEMENT: Water COST: 5  TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Deals 1 damage to every creature. Chance to move them row down down by one row. Removes invisibility.	NAME: Avalanche ELEMENT: Water COST: 4  TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Deals 1 damage to every opponent creature. Chance to move them row down down by one row. Removes invisibility.

ART: Edited by Daguerreo IDEA: Daguerreo NOTES: The idea is to create a combo with flooding, or with new card that can be used underwater. - Creatures have 50% to be moved a row down. - If a creature in the lower row is moved down, it is destroyed: There is 25% chance to destroy a creature in the middle row using 2 Avalanche,  and 50% using 3 of it. - If a slot of a lower row is already occupied, creature is not moved down, otherwise is moved according to following scheme: SERIES:

Code: [Select]

A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H
  A   B   C   D   E   F   G
A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H


[Dwerg]

looks cool, nice idea, I guess it might need a better wording only.

[Jenkar]

Wow. This is awesome.
Questions : only affects opponents?
Supposing this is your view, and opponent plays avalanche :

Code: [Select]

-   -   A   B   -   -   -   -
  -   -   X   -   -   -   -
-   -   C   D   -   -   -   -
X is a creature, all other spots are free. Where is it moved? A,B,C,D, A/B or C/D?

[Jocko]

Could be
Unupped : whole field
Upped : enemy field

And, about where would it move the creature, isn't each creature slot numbered, so it could move to the lowest numbered adyacent one?

[zgatt]

Great idea! I suggest you change the 2nd line of text to "Chance to move all creatures up by one row." Saying "They can be moved..." gives the idea that the player has a choice over whether to move them or not.

[Daguerreo]

Wow. This is awesome.
Questions : only affects opponents?
Supposing this is your view, and opponent plays avalanche :

Code: [Select]

-   -   A   B   -   -   -   -
  -   -   X   -   -   -   -
-   -   C   D   -   -   -   -
X is a creature, all other spots are free. Where is it moved? A,B,C,D, A/B or C/D?

No, I think on both fields for 2 reasons:
1. Try to balancing the card.
2. You could take advantage to move your  creatures underwater

mmh, like this?

A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H
   A   B   C   D   E   F   G
A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H

Could be
Unupped : whole field
Upped : enemy field

And, about where would it move the creature, isn't each creature slot numbered, so it could move to the lowest numbered adyacent one?

Those answer should be good for your question too

[Jenkar]

Um. So if i understood correctly :

Code: [Select]

-   -   A   -   -   -   -   -
  -   -   X   -   -   -   -
-   -   A   -   -   -   -   -
   
With X creature before, A creature after.

[Daguerreo]

Um. So if i understood correctly :

Code: [Select]

-   -   A   -   -   -   -   -
  -   -   X   -   -   -   -
-   -   A   -   -   -   -   -
   
With X creature before, A creature after.

Supposing to use Avalanche twice and a creature is in A slot in first row is A(1° row) -> X(2° row) -> A(3°row)

[Jocko]

But X (middle row) is, at least for the purpose of flooding, the top row, so, moving creatures from the top A to X would save them.

[Jenkar]

But X (middle row) is, at least for the purpose of flooding, the top row, so, moving creatures from the top A to X would save them.

If they're not water, they can't be in top A...

[Daguerreo]

Modifyed the first post.

For upgraded card, dealing 2 damages could be too much?

[Jocko]

I think 2 dmg would be too much.

But X (middle row) is, at least for the purpose of flooding, the top row, so, moving creatures from the top A to X would save them.

If they're not water, they can't be in top A...

Why not?