Scorpion Lord|Scorpion King

[Glitch]

NAME: Scorpion Lord ELEMENT: Death COST: 10 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: X|Y TEXT: X = Scorpions in Play Y = Enemy's Poison Venomous (Deals damage in the form of poison)	NAME: Scorpion King ELEMENT: Death COST: 10 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: X|Y TEXT: X = Scorpions in Play Y = Enemy's Poison Venomous (Deals damage in the form of poison)

ART: elshazam IDEA: Gl1tch NOTES: Art found here: http://browse.deviantart.com/?qh=&section=&q=Scorpion+King#/d37bqnq Preeeetttty sure it's copyright, so don't put this in the crucible or whatnot. I don't really like this card, to be honest, it's more of a proof-of-concept thing.  I'm thinking certain synergies should exist in things other than elements.  E.G, all the elements have a scorpion, and the scorpion king brings them together.  You can build a scorpion deck if you wish.  (Scorpions = Scorpion, Death Stalker, Dune Scorpion, Chrysorra??, Blood Sucker??) The card next should say that X = Scorpions you control The whole thing needs balanced. But oh well, you get the point. SERIES: Pffftch.  Series.  Good one!

[thatnewguy]

This card needs my picture on it.  8)

10 random  for upgraded? Ehhh... I don't like it. Maybe lower cost to 8 instead?

[Glitch]

This card needs my picture on it.  8)

10 random  for upgraded? Ehhh... I don't like it. Maybe lower cost to 8 instead?

Ah, random quanta always seems more expensive than it is.  Imagine a rainbow deck with only scorpions, quantum pillars, and this card.  (Oh, and buff spells for deathstalker and dune and stuffs, or maybe them excluded).  Ten random quanta only takes 3 turns to get, with one pillar.

Is your picture copywritten?

[thatnewguy]

Not the expense, but I mean the randomness of the card. I would think either make the card for unupped and upper or make it random for both. But seems balanced enough.

[OldTrees]

Probably it would be too situational as a single card due in part to a corresponding high cost.

Split it into 2 smaller Scorpions?
The X attack combined with Venomous. (perhaps doesn't count itself to get a low cost like 3-6 ?)
The 1|Y/2? HP combined with Venom. (Nice 2nd Life scorpion? 3-6 ?)

[headshrinker]

Great card!should have a passive ability poisonous~

[Nepycros]

I don't like the concept that a "king" would need a commensalist bond with its subjects in order to survive. I would've thought it would buff the scorpions, not the other way around.

[Glitch]

I don't like the concept that a "king" would need a commensalist bond with its subjects in order to survive. I would've thought it would buff the scorpions, not the other way around.

That was the other idea I had.   Imagine if all scorpions come into play with 0 attack, (the life scorpion would have 0 attack but be cheaper), and the scorpion king gave all scorpions +1|+1.

[moomoose]

if you smell what the Gl1tch is cookin?

[vrt]

Current card art can't be used. There an email adress on the image - I suggest shooting him an email about permission to display this work.

[Rutarete]

I don't like the concept that a "king" would need a commensalist bond with its subjects in order to survive. I would've thought it would buff the scorpions, not the other way around.

That was the other idea I had.   Imagine if all scorpions come into play with 0 attack, (the life scorpion would have 0 attack but be cheaper), and the scorpion king gave all scorpions +1|+1.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,18582.0.html

[Glitch]

I don't like the concept that a "king" would need a commensalist bond with its subjects in order to survive. I would've thought it would buff the scorpions, not the other way around.

That was the other idea I had.   Imagine if all scorpions come into play with 0 attack, (the life scorpion would have 0 attack but be cheaper), and the scorpion king gave all scorpions +1|+1.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,18582.0.html

Interesting...