Jet Stream | Jet Stream

[Lordpants]

NAME: Air Stream ELEMENT: Air COST: 5  TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: N/A ABILITY: All Airbourne creatures your opponent controls recieve 2 damage	NAME: Air Stream ELEMENT: Air COST: 5  TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: N/A ABILITY: All Airbourne creatures your opponent controls recieve 3 damage

ART: Art by Calvin J. Hamilton http://cnls.lanl.gov/~petersen/header.html IDEA: Lordpants NOTES: I wanted to give Air something they could use to fight against the winged creatures of other elements. SERIES: Forthcoming Air Series

[Kuroaitou]

Again with these inconsistent card image resolutions - did you by chance use the wrong link when copying the image source into the code? 

I kind of like the card idea, but the problem is that this card seems to have a very expensive cost for a mechanic that's fairly situational (it pairs well up with Wings, but this would be useless against any deck that doesn't have any airbourne creatures/only use creatures from Earth, Gravity, or Life (no airbourne creatures excluding the dragons)). Rain of Fire, for example, only costs 5  and does 3 damage to each creature without regards to the airbourne passive.


Oh, and after taking a look at your code, the author/artist name is technically from Calvin J. Hamilton, I believe. http://www.solarviews.com/eng/copyright.htm

[Lordpants]

Alright the size is fixed along with the added art name. It was just those two cards ironically. I figured I should adjust the cost .. 3 or 4?

[wizelsnarf]

I like the idea of a jet stream operating on airborne creatures. Very good concept.

Thinking about jetstreams, I immediately thought this card could go either way. If you are going with the jetstream, you speed up, if you are going against it, you slow down.

With that interpretation I thought it would make a good permanent.

Jet Stream: Your airborne creatures gain +1/+0, enemy airborne creatures gain -1/+0


Feel free to ignore my idea...

[Lordpants]

I used the +1|+0 for airbourne for my Griffin card, so I had to think of something new for this one, I like the concept but I feel I need to lower the cost to 4 Air or 3 Air.