The game has been static for roughly six months, and IMO could use a shot in the arm should zanz return to action. A hoax earlier today, where someone shopped up a fake 'in development' screenshot, got me thinking: what cards that were already in existence would be the best fit for new implementations into the game?
My proposal-
1) Each IF member submits 3-5 cards from each element, that have already been made (crucible rank, archive status or submission being irrelevant).
*Cards may nominated by the creator, considering some of us could likely think of cards we have made for each element more readily than those by others, but make an effort to nominate a good chunk of others' cards as well.
**IMO it would be best to aim for cards that are more along the lines of seraph than fractal- and not completely change the face of the game as we know it.
***Also strive to select cards that would not be a potential coding nightmare for zanz, such as 'adjacent creatures' (despite my personal love of the concept) or pseudo quanta, which may be tedious coding processes.
****Maybe give an edge to newer cards which he has presumably not yet looked at and passed on implementing previously.
*****And probably avoid weapons since I am going to infer that he is leaving it at 1 weapon per element for a reason.
2) From the concatenated list, for each element, use IF voting to reduce it to 5 cards of each element.
3) From the resulting top five of each element, either IF voting, or public voting, to narrow it down to a list of 2 for each element.
This list would hopefully do some of the work for zanz to sort through if and when he should come back. Any suggestions/feedback on the selection criteria or the vetting process? Or does it sound like a waste of time/effort?
(edit- when making up my own list, i realized 5 is a *lot*. moved it down to 3 per person minimum, 5 cards maximum, per element)