25
Issue Archive / Re: "Show All" doesn't show all
« on: August 18, 2010, 05:23:50 pm »
This isn't really a bug as much as it's a feature request...
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
When someone submits a bug, and it is confirmed by other members that it is a bug or probably a bug (if unsure), they should edit the end of the title of the thread to say "Bug Confirmed." That way it's easier for Zanz to see what's actually a bug and what isn't, without having to look at every thread.Might need a bug thread moderator as well... someone that could easily weed out all the 'TU+Chimera bug' and similar threads... as well as keep up with all the statuses.
If it's not a bug, then the end should also probably be changed. "No Bug" would probably suffice.
I have 2 nymphs on main.That's funny... that's why I'm not bothering with an alternate account... with my luck I'd win a black nymph on it...
My alt account has 3.
List updated up to this point.
Shard of Meekness posted on page 4Meekness is still on the OverPowered list...
i still prefer the version with water towers thoughI thought about that too, but you can't get a purple nymph from a water pendulum if you're in a bind... I still haven't got anything satisfactory yet...
particularly against FGs like paradox, FQ or DG...if you've played with nympho, you'll know what i mean
i think maybe water pends + entropy mark would work better
You see them as charitable... when a shard is played against someone, think of it as they are being forced to take up a virtue. Charity is played and the opponent has to practice charity. Restraint is played on an enemy, and that creature has to practice restraint.hmmmm well charity can work all kinds off ways.... you towards your monsters or quantaAre you suggesting that if you play this shard and I am forced to give up quanta, then you are upholding the virtue of Charity?
but my shard of charity holds the virtue of charity because....
1. the player's opponent is the holder or the virtue of charity and it does say generously donates
2. true charity asks for nothing in return
3. 3. a charitable act or work, in the opponent's eyes when donating quanta to heal you isn't that pretty charitable itself?
4. since the card isn't stackable you are not asking for too much and being too greedy
you can say that yourself is a *USERNAME HERE* charity and your opponent is being charitable towards you
OPPONENT- is charitable because he donates
PLAYER- #4- only one shard of charity can be in play so you are actually thinking of the well being of the opponent as well....if it was stackable then you are not having a (5. benevolent feeling ) towards the other player....
Should anyone else on the blunt end of your shards action see you as Charitable?
Charity is a virtue. The card paints the picture of charity. Forcing charity on your opponent is a proper use of the card. Nobody is going to play a Shard of Charity that makes you donate 2 quanta to heal your opponent. That's absurd. If you really want to be virtuous, you might as well not even start the battle. As your goal is to defeat your opponent.Kael, I think you're focusing on the wrong part. A virtue does not make it virtuous. Virtue of Charity. and since the card name would be "Shard of Charity", there's no reference to the "Virtue of" part in the card itself.vir·tue /ˈvɜrtʃu/ Show Spelled[vur-choo] Show IPA
–noun
- conformity of one's life and conduct to moral and ethical principles; uprightness; rectitude.1. Pick a virtue from the list below.
Forcing someone to give is not charity in any sense of the word.
Permafrost wouldn't be too useful if it freezes antimattered creatures. I'd say replace the shield and the quantum tower with your choice of hourglasses, precogs, PA's, darkness towers, SoG's, or regular sundials.I'm 99.9% sure permafrost doesn't freeze creatures with an attack of 2 or less...
Kael, I think you're focusing on the wrong part. A virtue does not make it virtuous. Virtue of Charity. and since the card name would be "Shard of Charity", there's no reference to the "Virtue of" part in the card itself.^^^ THIS!