Elements v 1.31a: (not) Shards the Game

[Absol]

Quick response, might miss some details:
underworld because its skill cost will use the most dominant shard's element.
Shards were virtues, till there are 12 of them. Name change is intentional so each shard can be acronymized (is that a word?) to just three letters. Feel free to suggest new nameset to replace current one.
Annihilation clashed with Agility (Freedom clashed with Focus and Fortitude anyway) and Creativity clashed with Corruption.
Is my SoSa UP? Is the SoFor balanced?

[Chapuz]

Quick response, might miss some details:
underworld because its skill cost will use the most dominant shard's element.
Shards were virtues, till there are 12 of them. Name change is intentional so each shard can be acronymized (is that a word?) to just three letters. Feel free to suggest new nameset to replace current one.
Annihilation clashed with Agility (Freedom clashed with Focus and Fortitude anyway) and Creativity clashed with Corruption.
Is my SoSa UP? Is the SoFor balanced?

SoFocus and SoFort are well balanced, and SoSa can be changed to 2 turns imo.

[ZephyrPhantom]

Quick response, might miss some details:
underworld because its skill cost will use the most dominant shard's element.
Shards were virtues, till there are 12 of them. Name change is intentional so each shard can be acronymized (is that a word?) to just three letters. Feel free to suggest new nameset to replace current one. Or you could just add one/two more letters...
Annihilation clashed with Agility (Freedom clashed with Focus and Fortitude anyway) and Creativity clashed with Corruption. When I meant Annihilation I was talking more about "Why exactly does a Shard corrupt things and how is lowering Max HP corruption? Void is perfectly fine and no other shards uses SoV as an acronym."
Is my SoSa UP? Is the SoFor balanced? See Fury | Beserk regarding SoSa. The concept seems suited for an entirely new card. SoFor seems balanced.

[Zaealix]

Shard of Focus I like...As for rename...Maybe Shard of Determination?
Dang it, it's so hard to think of a good virtue name for Gravity...Maybe because there aren't particularly any virtues connected to Gravity yet.

[thispersonisagenius]

Shard of Force? It fits Gravity, and kind of fits what the Shard does.

[furballdn]

Shard golem now  . I no longer fear RT.

[Absol]

Shard of Concentration for ! ( goes back to SoV)
I'm thinking, maybe if SoSa sacrifice max HP it could be less abusable?

SoI's current RT resistance is nothing. You play shard golem decks in shard deck, using Nova and QP. With Mark. And just mark and those quanta generators are not enough to resummon golem in time. Shard Golem is more vulnerable to RT than Lava Golem, mainly because it sacrifice much more card advantage to make one.
It's safe to assume that SoI is used in a highly specialized deck, and thus high cost is acceptable. Though it certainly needs cost increasement.

[furballdn]

Shard golem now  . I no longer fear RT.

I am asking why you are buffing shard golem. Many would agree it does not need this buff.

[Annele]

I like this, though I think there are better options for the shard. I personally really like Xeno's SoE, though what it could be is up for debate.

[Absol]

Shard golem now  . I no longer fear RT.

I am asking why you are buffing shard golem. Many would agree it does not need this buff.

SoI's current RT resistance is nothing. You play shard golem decks in shard deck, using Nova and QP. With Mark. And just mark and those quanta generators are not enough to resummon golem in time. Shard Golem is more vulnerable to RT than Lava Golem, mainly because it sacrifice much more card advantage to make one.
It's safe to assume that SoI is used in a highly specialized deck, and thus high cost is acceptable. Though it certainly needs cost increasement.

To elaborate:
You put QP and Nova in SG (Shard Golem, not ScaredGirl) deck. Quanta usage is in . Giving RT resistance in form of casting cost does not make it easier to re-summon. It also eats up your hand in the initial cast, which is lost in one RT. To build enough , you use Mark of Earth, which is too slow to resummon SG before you're dead.
Conclusion: high cost in is possible because you do not use any elemental pillar in SG deck. Maybe 12 | 10 .

[DarkBaron12390]

I liek this but that Earth shard is way too OP right now.

[furballdn]

Shard golem now  . I no longer fear RT.

I am asking why you are buffing shard golem. Many would agree it does not need this buff.

SoI's current RT resistance is nothing. You play shard golem decks in shard deck, using Nova and QP. With Mark. And just mark and those quanta generators are not enough to resummon golem in time. Shard Golem is more vulnerable to RT than Lava Golem, mainly because it sacrifice much more card advantage to make one.
It's safe to assume that SoI is used in a highly specialized deck, and thus high cost is acceptable. Though it certainly needs cost increasement.

To elaborate:
You put QP and Nova in SG (Shard Golem, not ScaredGirl) deck. Quanta usage is in . Giving RT resistance in form of casting cost does not make it easier to re-summon. It also eats up your hand in the initial cast, which is lost in one RT. To build enough , you use Mark of Earth, which is too slow to resummon SG before you're dead.
Conclusion: high cost in is possible because you do not use any elemental pillar in SG deck. Maybe 12 | 10 .

Still not answering my question. Why does shard golem need a buff?

Also, SoW is way too OP as it is now. 1 + 3 :other = trollolol