This sounds like a good plan to me. Just 2 votes on someone with no evidence just seems a bit pathetic.
Day 1: Didn't vote. There was confusion over whether or not we were doing a train or a conga, and I was pretty busy IRL so I thought I'd leave it rather than potentially doing the wrong thing.
Day 2: Didn't vote. Similar to day 1, after finding that we didn't have to vote. Now, looking back, I want to analyse that day:
There were two big trains and a little one. I would consider the people who, midway through this voting phase when the two big trains were being repeatedly tied up, worthy of suspicion on Maxie/Archie. Treldon, Kirby, frozen, Dm, possibly Zawadx (though he notified that 2 trains were bad, it is possible, though unlikely he was the second of the two to vote, in which case his note about 2 trains being bad COULD be a clever way to hide his role - though as I said, very unlikely) Fippe didn't tie up the vote, so maybe less likely? Those who voted early in the day are also a little suspect, but something about the tieing up of the votes for no reason just rankled with me a bit. I could be wrong, people could still have been getting to grips with the roles / rules, but looking back in order to write this explanation of my voting it seems odd. I also might have missed something that clears some of these of suspicion, or not highlighted people who voted strangely. I just think that that day needs looking at closely.
Day 3: Got bored of not voting, just because we wouldn't be MKed for not voting doesn't mean we shouldn't. How will the game progress without voting? I didn't want to conga, so I went with UTA's vote, hoping for more info / suspicions from others. Sadly none came, so we killed Magicarp. Poor Magicarp.
