*Author

Offline godofdeath500Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 591
  • Country: us
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • godofdeath500 is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Only when we lose ourselves, do we find who we are
Nymph Queen (needs better name) https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=24234.msg309517#msg309517
« on: April 10, 2011, 08:48:32 pm »
Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u6 6ve 6ve 717 717 745 74b 7ai 7ai 7dm 7dm 7gk 7gp 7h0 7h0 7h0 7h0 7k1 7k5 7n7 7n7 7q5 7q5 7um 7um 80h 80hCards x2, mark x3.

An FG based on creating Nymphs, but also has the power to mutate any unwanted nymphs. Of course, the AI prefers to mutate Skeletons (and if the AI has a Death Nymph, it will afla its own creatures at least during testing it did. ). I was suprised at how well the AI handled this during testing. I opted to add Explosions in lieu of Steals to avoid any confusion with Jezebel.

This FG is also a serious PC offender, with 4 Explosions and whatever it gets from mutants. It might be too strong, since I only won five games out of 20, testing 2 decks: CCYB and  RoL/Hope. RoL/Hope seems to have the best chance against this, having won three of the 5 times.

Any suggestions on how to tune it are much appreciated.

EDIT: Tested it some more. It seems that RoL/Hope, no matter what variant, seems to do extremely well against this. Tested it 20 more times, and won 6, using RoL/Hope.
[21:47:33] ‹godofdeath500› 5 years and not a single war.
[21:47:45] ‹godofdeath500› I do not live up to my name.

migster99

  • Guest
Re: Nymph Queen (needs better name) https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=24234.msg313793#msg313793
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2011, 03:22:05 pm »
Too strong? That's fine! This is a false god...

I am surprised on how well the AI can play this. Only won 3 out of 15 games.

Offline godofdeath500Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 591
  • Country: us
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • godofdeath500 is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Only when we lose ourselves, do we find who we are
Re: Nymph Queen (needs better name) https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=24234.msg313894#msg313894
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2011, 05:04:36 pm »
Too strong? That's fine! This is a false god...

I am surprised on how well the AI can play this. Only won 3 out of 15 games.
Could you post what deck you used so I can add it?
[21:47:33] ‹godofdeath500› 5 years and not a single war.
[21:47:45] ‹godofdeath500› I do not live up to my name.

migster99

  • Guest
Re: Nymph Queen (needs better name) https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=24234.msg314036#msg314036
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2011, 07:57:37 pm »
No, I was using CCYB too...

Offline manaboy100

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 417
  • Country: id
  • Reputation Power: 5
  • manaboy100 is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • *staaaaaaaaaare*
Re: Nymph Queen (needs better name) https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=24234.msg314717#msg314717
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2011, 01:42:17 pm »
We have Jezebel already :D. And looks like FG grinder decks xD #offtopic

That deck looks pretty straightforward, summon Otys with Quint. I know that Crusader might be useful, but if the deck meet a weaponless deck, it might be useless, so I think the deck should have some weapons itself :D Water Tower isn't really needed, 8 Tears should be enough. And that single Charger, hrmmmm.... How about Purifies instead? And BTW, could the AI play the Tears to the Pends?
*staaaaaaaaaare*

Offline godofdeath500Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 591
  • Country: us
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • godofdeath500 is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Only when we lose ourselves, do we find who we are
Re: Nymph Queen (needs better name) https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=24234.msg314922#msg314922
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2011, 07:14:15 pm »
We have Jezebel already :D. And looks like FG grinder decks xD #offtopic

That deck looks pretty straightforward, summon Otys with Quint. I know that Crusader might be useful, but if the deck meet a weaponless deck, it might be useless, so I think the deck should have some weapons itself :D Water Tower isn't really needed, 8 Tears should be enough. And that single Charger, hrmmmm.... How about Purifies instead? And BTW, could the AI play the Tears to the Pends?
I thought about adding a weapon, but there isn't any need to. Your right about the crusader, since it can potentially turn a strategy  against you, but if there isn't a weapon, oh well. And Purifies would just toss Dune-Scorpion-based decks upside down, as well as any deck that relies on poison.

And yes, the AI will play tears on a pend, but only if the towers are not on the field. I don't know the percentage, but there are times when it doesn't get any towers in hand, only the pends. Hence the mark of water.
[21:47:33] ‹godofdeath500› 5 years and not a single war.
[21:47:45] ‹godofdeath500› I do not live up to my name.

 

blarg: