A Few Ideas

[Rutarete]

while these ideas are radical, i think they could work (with a little tweaking)

1. Tactical Offense
-cost 7 random quanta
-adds a second weapon slot by replacing the Shield slot
- upgraded has same name but costs one less random

2. Sabotage- permanent
Renders weapon slot unusable as long as this is in play
cost- 7 random quanta
upgraded has same name but costs one less random

3. ????? (no name yet)- creature
stats- 5/5
cost: 6 random quanta
-ability: Consumer: this creature consumes 5 of your own quanta per turn; if you do not have the required consumer cost, this creature dies.

4. upgraded of #3.
name- ?????
stats- 7/6
cost- 4 random quanta
ability: Consumer: this creature consumes 7 of your own quanta per turn; if you do not have the required consumer cost, this creature dies.

i was actually thinking of the Myr artifact creatures from MTG for #3. i know it's worse than an Abomination but perhaps the upgraded is worth it
and for Sabotage, maybe the ability could be permanently or for 5 turns or so
please comment   

[ZephyrPhantom]

#1 has already been done for both swords and shields.
#2 is interesting, I like it.  Try making it into a card.
#3/4, you read my mind! I was planning to make cards like these but I had work to do so I couldn't!

[joebob777]

i dont like the consumers, i think pest costs 3 , if im wrong, who cares, and since 1 quantum pillar = 1 elemetal tower, then 3 = 1 :elemental
so the consumers cost 2 and 1.3 elemental quanta, with more attack and more consume then pest at a lower cost, it makes pest virtually worthless

[ninjamaster1991]

I think #3+4 take your own quanta, but if not, then clarify. Make them 10/1 and 15/1 or so...

[Rutarete]

i dont like the consumers, i think pest costs 3 , if im wrong, who cares, and since 1 quantum pillar = 1 elemetal tower, then 3 = 1 :elemental
so the consumers cost 2 and 1.3 elemental quanta, with more attack and more consume then pest at a lower cost, it makes pest virtually worthless

sorry. i meant that it takes your own quanta every turn. it does not give you any like pest does.

[Rutarete]

I think #3+4 take your own quanta, but if not, then clarify. Make them 10/1 and 15/1 or so...

it is your own. i changed the original post to clarify that

[joebob777]

ok, if they consume your own quanta each turn, then you can lower the cost to virtually nothing

[Rutarete]

ok, if they consume your own quanta each turn, then you can lower the cost to virtually nothing

that would just make it OP
would you be happy with it if i lower the cost for #s 3 and 4 by one?

[joebob777]

i doubt it would make it op but yes, since it absorbs a heck of a lot of quantum each turn, and if a 5|5 elite cockatrice costs 3 , then it would take just 2 turns for the card to pay form more then  itself (1 elementel = 3 rainbow, so 3 =9 ) but only one turn if you have to pay 5 to get it on the field, and then it'll just be taking your quantum from there, so i think the next to nothing nerf on each of them is a nescessity with a high playing price like that

[Rutarete]

alright. you've convinced me.
new costs for # 3 and 4
4 and 2 random quanta

[johannhowitzer]

You can lower the cost of #3/4 to 1 random quantum - remember, it is consuming 5/7 quanta on the turn you play it as well.  No need to pay even more.

[Rutarete]

nah, if it's just 1 per turn it doesn't have really much effect at all; maybe 3/2 or so; that's more in the middle