Oracle : Decay

[BluexLightning]

he is annoying to beat with his quanta denial but you did i good job with these decks. I usually use a dim shield deck with stops pests from taking your quanta..

[Jappert]

he is annoying to beat with his quanta denial but you did i good job with these decks. I usually use a dim shield deck with stops pests from taking your quanta..

Dim Shields don' t actually stop pests from draining your quanta.

Grats on your 23rd post btw!

[mycale]

Decay needs a buff with the new quanta cap. Now, any shield that protects from 2 dmg will make het/him useless. Before, at least you would also need to be careful about her/his drain life, but now they are just a joke.

[gumbeh]

Grats on your 23rd post btw!

I liked the guy who posted feedback on two separate Oracle FG decks within the space of a couple hours.

[makapse]

just EMed him with this deck.he seems to like stealing SoGs over sanc,so all the better so prevent quanta denial.Also,i was lucky enough to get a light dragon as my pet,so my Rol was defenitely fractalled before he died.
unless you dont get quanta denialed(hard with 6 sanc),you have defenitely won a EM since,5 rays are put to die,in the hope that he will fractal atleast 1 of those,and his max damage possible is 23 +4=27,while your worst case heal,with 4 sancs stolen which wont happen if you play a SoG,is still 26

by makapse

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4t7 4t7 4t7 4t7 4t7 4t7 5c4 5c4 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5rg 5rg 5rg 5ro 5ro 5ro 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 8pq

[Chodos]

I have lost so many times with the first deck because of the lack of quanta. What about a little tweak to the first deck? Also, I just tried the second deck for the first time and got an easy EM. How about an import code for an upgraded version? The Jade shield insures that devourers don't do any damage and drain life can't be used.

Great deck!

[Boingo]

I tried ddevans's's's's deck (as close I could make it anyway)--got EM win with 2 cards left.  Opening hand with BE, 4 sancs, 1 shield and 1 firemaster made for some interesting choices.  I couldn't find quint or PA forever, and a couple of stolen QTs forced me to play some naked firemasters.  Luckily early siphons do little damage, and so I kept the attack of one master at 2 just so BE could be used later.  I lost the first little guy after 3 siphons, and the second one finally got quinted at 1 hp, but after a protected sanc and shield were up it was smoother sailing.

Wasn't sure about BE being necessary, but removing dusk let me finish him off without worry.  Might consider unstoppable instead since it'd be a slightly cheaper 3-card combo:
(   + 3 cards) vs  ( + 3 cards, and then another )  Downside will be an electrocutor will prevent the EM possibility.

EM but no cards.

Verdict:  Very crappy hand with slightly watered down deck still manages EM.  It's a winner, I guarantee it.*

by Boingo

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4sa 4sa 4sa 55u 55u 592 5c4 5lm 5lm 5lm 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6u8 74e 77i 77i 77i 7ak 7ak 7k6 7k6 7k6 80h 80h 80h 8pn

*Guarantee not a guarantee.

[ddevans96]

Yeah, momentum is another good choice. I like BE better because of better EM potential, and, also because your destroyer can be played independently of your attackers, but it's definitely preference.

And thanks for the feedback

[ddevans96]

Went with my deck, fully unupped, +2 pillars. EM with 0 cards left, I think I probably got a bit lucky.

A 40-card variant may be best fully unupped, I'll work on that.

[Casshern1324]

50% chance to miss...

Yeah, I totally only missed 50% of the time...

[Rember]

Heh, the 3 stolen sancs make that screenshot.

[salox]

by salox

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 58v 58v 592 592 5c2 5c4 5c4 5fa 5fa 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5rl 5rl 5rl 621 621 8pq

best
strategy
ever!