Shard of Void | Shard of Void

[Angelic_Dawn]

Havent really found a good use for it yet, But its a nice concept.

[Skotadi Phobos]

love the art but I expected more. like creatures with 3 attack or lower would heal you for a few turns. it just seems like compared to the other shards this one is pretty weak.

[onnig]

Waiting for confirmation? Zanz is never going to look at this thread. I have no ways of contacting him. And no one will remember to ask Zanz about where he got the idea from the next time he appears in chat. Honestly, doing this is not worth his time or your time. He has better things to do, and so do you.

I seem to vaguely remember someone mentioning that Zanz read my Void series. If I'm not just delusional, and you actually manage to find that post, will that be sufficient proof?

Maybe he got the inspiration deep from his unconscious mind, months after reading your series, and might not be able to remember, or maybe even recognize, the actual source of this idea. I hope you get credited for the card idea, especially if it's this particular case I'm speaking of, as it will be a bit hard to prove it. You might want to quote this as some sort of proof.

[bogtro]

This card seems a bit UP to me. The only time it is useful is against healing, making it so situational that it's barely worth carrying.

On a side note, if this is supposed to be the opposite of Divinity, why does Divinity heal but Void doesn't damage?

[SnoWeb]

On a side note, if this is supposed to be the opposite of Divinity, why does Divinity heal but Void doesn't damage?

I agree. To make it balanced and increase its use I probably should damage too.

[suxerz]

On a side note, if this is supposed to be the opposite of Divinity, why does Divinity heal but Void doesn't damage?

I agree. To make it balanced and increase its use I probably should damage too.

Well, it can sort of "damage" the opponent if he's at full health or the effect of your SoV pile is greater than his current health.

I disagree with the suggestion simply because SoD is a spell while SoV is a permanent. I probably can agree if it will just damage the opponent, but not damage AND reduce max health each turn. Another option is to make SoV as a spell too and with much greater effect, but meh... I don't like the idea for a card being an absolute opposite of another card.

[Zeru]

Suxerz. It would be good if the wording in the cards didn't suggest that they are opposite.

[Avenger]

On a side note, if this is supposed to be the opposite of Divinity, why does Divinity heal but Void doesn't damage?

I agree. To make it balanced and increase its use I probably should damage too.

It damages too, if this is your only damage.

[ax1997]

A great card, and very balanced too

[Max Fire]

Shard of void is underpowered and i think it needs a buff too.
Simple damages would be weak beacause it's not interesting compared to a creature.
I recommand to add life points reduction when it comes into play or increase life points reduction per turn.

[furballdn]

SoV is quite UP. 5|3  for 2|3 "permanent" damage isn't that big of a deal when most people's healing won't be affected by SoV.

[omegareaper7]

Shard of void is underpowered and i think it needs a buff too.
Simple damages would be weak beacause it's not interesting compared to a creature.
I recommand to add life points reduction when it comes into play or increase life points reduction per turn.

How is it underpowered? because its only decently good in stalls?