Insanity Seed | Insanity Spark

[Espithel]

NAME: Insanity Seed ELEMENT: Entropy COST: -3 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Your opponent gains 5 life.	NAME: Insanity Spark ELEMENT: Entropy COST: -5 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Your opponent gains 8 life.

ART: IDEA: Frozengaia NOTES: NEGATIVE QUANTA SERIES: Frozengaia's Forum Brawl (Dump)

[AD TienzuStorm]

So does it give you quanta when you play it? Could be interesting with Sundial so that all that happens is you gain a bunch of quanta.

[Espithel]

That is exactly what it does.

[kaempfer13]

also upped is much better because of Antimatter (oops it has 0 health, well just chaospower it afterwards). To bypass the immo problem give it the supernovatreatment; slight cost for much bigger returns

2
-4|0 gain 5 on play (upped identical and gives 6)

Edit: or you can give it the singularity treatment; immo gives 0 quanta; then your current unupped needs a buff.
Edit 2: You can also rework it into a spell
0 cost
Generate 5/6  and spawn a singularity; would be hilarious with chaos otyughs (this is actually op because of chimera antimatter combo)

This card could also enable some aflatoxin and even butterfly effect decks.

Yet another edit: what about fractal chimera antimatter? it's a 4 card combo so its probably fine, but id like to hear your opinions.

[Devourer]

OP, but reminds me of the old Void element series. Fun idea.

[foxrain4]

i thought creatures immediately die when they reaches 0 hp?

[kirbylover314]

i thought creatures immediately die when they reaches 0 hp?

That's the point. Basically this card heals opponent for 4|8 HP while you gain 2|4 entropy quanta. Think of it like a spell. It helps.

[Espithel]

Tbh, I should just make this a spell.

BUT NEGATIVE QUANTA
WHY ARE YOU SO PERSUASIVE
FIPPE IS NEGATIVE QUANTA ;~;

Oh, I could just have a spell with negative quanta... Okay
One moment...

Edit: Done

[ZephyrPhantom]

There are cases where a complex mechanic does something really silly to get a simple effect done. Unfortunately, this is one of these cases.

In a vacuum: Presentation-wise, I can understand why negative-quanta would raise a lot more eyebrows. Realistically, however, you're just better off with following Immolation's format and saying "On play, generate 2 ."

In a [hypothetical] series: This would make a lot more sense as part of a proof of concept to show that negative quanta can be simplistic and therefore doable. On it's own, however, the card doesn't do a very good job of showing why negative quanta has merit to be added in this game.

[dragtom]

mulligan.

Not sure if it's reason enough to keep it having negative quanta.

[Devourer]

A link to the Void element series because I think its relevant to the idea of negative quanta and also its the coolest idea. http://elementscommunity.org/forum/series/(series)-void-a-new-pseudo-element/