Dream Catcher | Dream Catcher

[Submachine]

@Fippe94
Option 1 (the Logical one): while SoSac and DC are in effect, no healing and no damage is taken.
Option 2 (my new opinion): ignore SoSac while DC is in play, and make damage sources do actual damage, while healing still = 0. Because SoSac is a rulebreaker already, it doesn't heal you additional HP for chained SoSacs.

@dragtom
+1 cost inrease is being considered.

@grimdragon32
Hmm, or . Hard decision. What does the community say?

@D2D
I encourage you to do cards for all FGs.
And I see what you did there, but I just think negating healing is enough effect already to take place, even though your idea follows the theme.

[dawn to dusk]

-snip-
@D2D
I encourage you to do cards for all FGs.
And I see what you did there, but I just think negating healing is enough effect already to take place, even though your idea follows the theme.

ooh fun, a challenge

[Scars]

Dream Catcher | Soul Stealer anyone? xD Like the card, Stops the miracles and pesky heal spells. Just hate dem so much. haha.

[Submachine]

Welcome to Forge! ^^
my first card that ever survived this long.

Opening discussion again for further improvement.

[kaempfer13]

I think just like purify this needs a secondary effect. Thematically it should definitely protect you from nightmares and thus provide hand protection. As actually reliable mechanic healing is out and dealing damage to the opponent probably doesnt fit dream catchers so well.

[Submachine]

The secondary effect should be some sort of protection or generation. For example: either your quanta cannot be altered or each turn a random quanta is generated.

[seulintse]

nice card, and it would be a good way to deal with the people who use miracles and all that other crap... lol :3

[Chapuz]

nice card, and it would be a good way to deal with the people who use miracles and all that other crap... lol :3

BUT, you never know when the opponent is going to play a deck with healing, except with a couple of FGs in the oracle. Would you spend a card slot in your deck against a random opponent (let's say PvP)?

[seulintse]

most decks have some form of healing, and if its a good rainbow, it'll probably have an empathic bond or two... while not every element has a card for healing, theres also stone skin, vampire skill, and a couple others.

[Submachine]

Currently I think the most fitting secondary effect would be quanta protection without hand protection. This would be representing the defensive nature of dream catchers.

However, if I'm to add a more reliable secondary effect, I'll have to change either the name or the element of the card (if not both). If I'm about to change it, should I make a new thread for it or should i post it here?

[Chapuz]

Currently I think the most fitting secondary effect would be quanta protection without hand protection. This would be representing the defensive nature of dream catchers.

However, if I'm to add a more reliable secondary effect, I'll have to change either the name or the element of the card (if not both). If I'm about to change it, should I make a new thread for it or should i post it here?

Do it here here

[Aknelo]

I kind of like the card just as it is, as listed on the first page.  Maybe the 1 quanta cost increase?  Also, while it fits darkness, I would also see it thematically fitting with death too.