Graviton Transport | Graviton Carrier

[moomoose]

NAME: Graviton Transport ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 5 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 1|10 TEXT: : Deploy Generate a Graviton Mercenary.	NAME: Graviton Carrier ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 5 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 1|15 TEXT: : Deploy Generate a Graviton Guard.

ART: Cryotube IDEA: moomoose NOTES: This would help make graviton mercenaries/guards relevant.  This card is can very mildly be compared to FFQ, FFQ is a bit more powerful due to the fireflies, and FFQ herself, having a higher attack values than this card and the creatures it produces, and fireflies being useful as quanta generators.  This card balances that by having a lower cost and a mono quanta ability, as well as little more cc resistance associated with gravity. The graviton mercenaries/guards could be used as either catapult fodder or attackers in their own right. SERIES:

[Aves]

Ooh, nice. It seems a tad too cheap right now, but that might just be me.

[Poker Alho]

Ooh, nice. It seems a tad too cheap right now, but that might just be me.

well it is weaker than FFQ and graviton guards dont produce quanta, although they are sturdier than fireflies

what i like this card the most is the fact that it can be run with mono

[n00b]

Oooh... finally, card using Cryo's amazing Gravity art EDIT: Sowwy Z. As a lover of Gravity, I must say how I like it a lot. I feel it is a bit cheap, that maybe a cost of 5 or 6 would keep it from being overpowered, but good overall. Maybe after a little tweaking it will be good to go

Good job

[ZephyrPhantom]

Oooh... finally, card using Cryo's amazing Gravity art.

*cough* Graviton Behemoth (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,36486.0.html) *cough*
Anyway, I like the FFQ-ness of the mechanic, but the spawner and the spawned creatures are rather sturdy compared to FFQ and Firefly. While lack of cross-quanta ability is compensated by the mono - ability, I feel like this card should get a +1 playing cost to both versions (right now it feels a little too easy to play these and swarm the opponent - most CC that doesn't Delay/Freeze or cast RT has a more negligible impact on this card due to high HP).

[furballdn]

In depth analysis/comparing with other creatures!
Pharaoh 9 , 3 atk 8hp, 2  for a 2|3 atk creature with devour
FFQ 7 , 3 atk 7 hp, 2 for a 3|4 atk creature that generates quanta
This card: 4 , 1atk 15hp, 2 for a 3atk creature.

I feel this should get a cost increase.

[waterzx]

Looks like it can be next main-hitter in Gravity.

Appreciate how you try to bring one of the most underused creatures back to the game. Simple yet creative.

But the only thing that concerns me is the vanilla aspect of graviton mercenaries/guards, as the use of this card would be limited in creature swarm which is already a very common strategy in this game.

[Poker Alho]

Looks like it can be next main-hitter in Gravity.

Appreciate how you try to bring one of the most underused creatures back to the game. Simple yet creative.

But the only thing that concerns me is the vanilla aspect of graviton mercenaries/guards, as the use of this card would be limited in creature swarm which is already a very common strategy in this game.

actually it would work pretty well with chimera for an enormous critter and meat shield

[waterzx]

actually it would work pretty well with chimera for an enormous critter and meat shield

Right, I didn't think of Chimera. Now I think this card is useful enough.

[moomoose]

increased the costs by 1

[OdinVanguard]

I would say either the unupped ability cost should be increased or the upped ability cost should be decreased. That way it would match the cost ratio of the upped and unupped cards it summons. Should be a fun card though. Would make a nice combo with catapult... especially in an earth duo with auburn nymphs.

[killsdazombies]

This card made me laugh at first. I thought the turtle was barfing up Golems XD I would suggest a cost increase by 1-2. Compared to firefly queen this is still better. (For gravity)