Elements the Game Forum - Free Online Fantasy Card Game

Elements the Game => Cards => Air => Topic started by: Delreich on January 12, 2010, 05:13:02 am

Title: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: Delreich on January 12, 2010, 05:13:02 am



An article was written on Dragonfly | Damselfly (http://elementscommunity.org/wiki/cards-air/dragonfly-damselfly/) as part of the Weekly Featured Cards project, courtesy of Kuroaitou.

Damselsflies are so pretty, they are targeted in purple :
(http://i.imgur.com/RhZWB.png)

Global Moderator Comment modified to use the card tag instead of the img tag
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: slovenc555 on January 24, 2010, 07:12:07 pm
simmilar to ash eater/brimestone eater. only with air. i still love it.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: Cynxos on January 24, 2010, 07:14:22 pm
simmilar to ash eater/brimestone eater. only with air. i still love it.
+It switches its attack with its life.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: Lucifear on January 27, 2010, 06:50:20 am
Upgraded, this card becomes an attacker, and a producer.
Definitely has potential.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: slovenc555 on January 27, 2010, 03:20:55 pm
yes, but it makes it weaker. You know, i care a lot about attack, but i care even more about defense.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: arzoo on February 11, 2010, 12:09:46 am
Strictly worse than storm crow   ;D
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: Glitch on February 11, 2010, 01:06:03 am
I never knew that about damselfly.....
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: tyranim on February 12, 2010, 10:10:35 pm
i never realy did like this card. its one of those cards that most wouldnt put in their deck. honestly, i dont see why zanz even made it. all it does is weaken air decks with a card that has almost no use
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: slovenc555 on February 13, 2010, 12:01:10 pm
it's cheap. If you don't get any pillars but a dragonfly/damslefly it's the only thing you can use without towers/novas. and if you ask why put dragonfly/damslefly into the game, you have to ask the same about asheater/brimestoneeater. It's almost the same, only with fire.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: tyranim on February 14, 2010, 02:14:48 am
then i ask the same about that too, and skeleton, and gnome rider. seriously, they serve almost no purpose to be in the bazaar.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: Glitch on February 14, 2010, 02:19:19 am
Skeleton is only there because it has to be for Graveyards to work.  I'm surprised Malignant cell isn't in the bazaar somewhere.

Two damage for 1 quantum and it pays for itself!?  Great in a speed deck, and brutal if you can somehow set up a pillar-less deck.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: tyranim on February 14, 2010, 02:53:53 am
the posts in the malignant cell thread will explain why it isnt in the bazaar.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: darkfrogger on February 15, 2010, 06:07:53 pm
Malignant cell would be ridiculously OP if you could buy it from the bazaar directly. It would allow you to get a full army at 0 cost.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: slovenc555 on February 15, 2010, 06:40:00 pm
and than the enemy wouldplay solar sheild (wich is ridiclusly weak) and all the damage you would deal would be blocked out and you still couldnt play creatures.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: darkfrogger on February 15, 2010, 09:09:30 pm
My point is that building a full army for free should not be allowed. The solar shield at least costs something to play.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: tyranim on February 16, 2010, 02:57:48 am
or you could send out a few elfs, quint them, then send out a few MCs ftw. an almost instant mutant army
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: akromat on February 16, 2010, 03:18:51 am
Strictly worse than storm crow   ;D
Hhahaha. It's been a long time since I've heard(read) this phrase.
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: Marvaddin on April 30, 2010, 11:05:36 pm
Its just me or this is the most useless creature in Elements? Surely its alike to Brimstone Eater, but fire can use those for a really fast deck. Fire has also superb creature and permanent control, so, yes, they can work like walking towers that increase the damage a bit.

According to the card usage stats published in March 17:

Ash Eater vs Dragonfly:
Unupgraded: 348k x 32k (more damage, I assume)
Upgraded: 68k x 3k (wow, almost 23/1)

No doubts about who is more usefull, the cards are the same upgraded, but fire element can use the quanta better. Even the upgraded Gnome Raider was used 8k times (graboid decks, I imagine).

I think I never saw a deck using dragonfly. Is there any, even among the AI ones?

So, should we discuss a way to improve it, or just wait air have a good use for the quanta this can produce?
Title: Re: Dragonfly / Damselfly
Post by: tyranim on April 30, 2010, 11:10:39 pm
i kind of like the idea of it being free, that way it can be used in a non air deck without having to put in a pillar
Title: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: Hyroen on February 01, 2011, 10:07:44 pm
(http://imageplay.net/img/m7Gbd135546/Dragonfly.png) (http://imageplay.net/)(http://elementscommunity.org/images/Cards/Upgrade.png)(http://imageplay.net/img/m7Gbd135547/Damselfly.png) (http://imageplay.net/)


EDIT : Damselfly's stats are back to 2|1.


Discuss.
Title: Re: Dragonfly change 1.27
Post by: cookiepirate on February 01, 2011, 10:09:13 pm
hmm...
i like it cuz air has a bunch of high cost cards
is this happening to ash eater/gnome eater too?
EDIT: i saw the thread answering that^^^
Title: Re: Dragonfly change 1.27
Post by: Camoninja on February 01, 2011, 10:14:06 pm
These were way underused before. I am glad to see this buff.
Title: Re: Dragonfly change 1.27
Post by: Wizardcat on February 01, 2011, 10:16:17 pm
In the Trainer, Damselfly is now 1|1 and free to play.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Hyroen on February 01, 2011, 10:22:30 pm
Tried to snipe as fast as possible. I guess I wasn't fast enough. Hah.

Forgive the minor inconvenience.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: doublecross on February 01, 2011, 10:40:12 pm
 :earth/ :aether   and  :air/ :aether just got easier.

I think this is balanced, though.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Essence on February 01, 2011, 10:43:11 pm
NOOOO!  This is a HUGE nerf for :air !  Damselfly just went from a badass finisher w/Sky Blitz to...fodder. :(
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: coinich on February 01, 2011, 10:43:51 pm
Might give a little more use, but I'm not sure.  I'm uncomfortable with creatures producing quanta because they are limited and vulnerable to more control IMO.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Falcon4415 on February 01, 2011, 10:46:01 pm
So little guys are basically becoming attacking pillars?
They can see some more play now, I approve (although I liked damselflies having 2 attack because of synergy with adren/blitz).
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: wizelsnarf on February 01, 2011, 10:51:22 pm
NOOOO!  This is a HUGE nerf for :air !  Damselfly just went from a badass finisher w/Sky Blitz to...fodder. :(
Don't know if you were being sarcastic, but either way I agree with your statement.

This is a painful nerf to damselfly.... It basically ruins my deck http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,18220.0.html (http://Fragile Flyers)

It will probably add a turn to the TTW. Really unhappy about this.

2|1 means 8 damage per turn, with adren. That is a nice card. 1|1 is like a joke. Super vulnerable and no bite either.


I am sad this will ruin my deck :(
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: ddevans96 on February 01, 2011, 10:53:11 pm
How is this a nerf to damselfly? Other than affecting the automulligan.....
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: icybraker on February 01, 2011, 10:55:45 pm
Yeah, I don't really see this as a buff either and I don't think this will improve Damselfly's already dismal status.

I disapprove of this, but then again, the old Damselfly wasn't much better.

How is this a nerf to damselfly? Other than affecting the automulligan.....
Damselfly's damage is halved if this new update sets in.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: wizelsnarf on February 01, 2011, 10:56:49 pm
How is this a nerf to damselfly? Other than affecting the automulligan.....
Yeah, I don't really see this as a buff either and I don't think this will improve Damselfly's already dismal status.

I disapprove of this, but then again, the old Damselfly wasn't much better.

How is this a nerf to damselfly? Other than affecting the automulligan.....
Damselfly's damage is halved if this new update sets in.

This is bad imo. Dragonfly could have used a buff, but Damselfly was fine! Why fix something that is not broken.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: ddevans96 on February 01, 2011, 10:57:13 pm
How is this a nerf to damselfly? Other than affecting the automulligan.....
Damselfly's damage is halved if this new update sets in.
*headdesk* Thank you for reminding me of that :)
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: truddy02 on February 01, 2011, 11:16:03 pm
I like the new unupped version but I would prefer the upped version to stay 2|1 with 1 :air cost.  Damselfly was quite useful before as an early attacker to bring down HP for later attacks with wyrms and/or sky blitz.  In my opinion it is not much less useful and also far inferior to RoL because of RoL's use with hope.  My vote would be for this new dragonfly but keep old damselfly.  That sees to be many people's thoughts so maybe it will be changed.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Wonder on February 01, 2011, 11:17:35 pm
Whaa so many different and better versions of RoL now.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: doublecross on February 01, 2011, 11:37:17 pm
Except... they don't produce light, and thus don't combo with Hope.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: gavsword on February 01, 2011, 11:44:40 pm
Making Damselfly a 2|1 for free, or even a 3|1 (crazy, I know) would make me happy. It's frankly barely worth upgrading.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Rutarete on February 02, 2011, 12:04:35 am
how about making the upgraded a 2/1 and keep the air production?
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: doublecross on February 02, 2011, 12:05:51 am
Lose the air production? That is what made this card fun in the first place! That was there before the buff.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Rutarete on February 02, 2011, 12:09:49 am
Lose the air production? That is what made this card fun in the first place! That was there before the buff.
oops. typo. i meant keep. i was thinking about my own card
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: doublecross on February 02, 2011, 12:15:44 am
I don't believe it was.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Rutarete on February 02, 2011, 12:17:28 am
suit yourself
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: doublecross on February 02, 2011, 12:19:01 am
?    What just happened. I thought I was replying to a post that said "Why did the nerf the unupped? O.o"


I didn't mean to question your response.


Am I hallucinating? Did a post get deleted?
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Rutarete on February 02, 2011, 12:26:53 am
oh. do you remember who posted it?
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: doublecross on February 02, 2011, 12:27:49 am
Nope. The user pic had some red in it though.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: plastiqe on February 02, 2011, 12:57:32 am
Stop spamming this thread with one sentence responses that have nothing to do with the card change please.

I agree that the unupped change is good, but the upgraded one isn't.  A) because it was useful before and B) because it's now the exact same as RoL, air version.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: doublecross on February 02, 2011, 01:00:01 am
Fine. Back on topic.

I would disagree. I like the new upgraded one.
It makes sense thematically that an insect would have no cost.
It isn't a clone of RoL because it has more health, makes  :air, and doesn't combo with Hope.
Though I'll admit this card still isn't very strong, it isn't supposed to be.
The upped one is an air pillar with 1 attack, essentially. I see nothing wrong with that.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: icybraker on February 02, 2011, 01:05:19 am
Fine. Back on topic.

I would disagree. I like the new upgraded one.
It makes sense thematically that an insect would have no cost.
It isn't a clone of RoL because it has more health, makes  :air, and doesn't combo with Hope.
Though I'll admit this card still isn't very strong, it isn't supposed to be.
The upped one is an air pillar with 1 attack, essentially. I see nothing wrong with that.
It's not a clone of RoL... it's weaker. Its extra point of health really doesn't change anything. RoL is cool because it can couple with Hope to great effect. Gemfinder is cool because it's great in a Golem deck for much-needed :earth quanta. However, the new Damselfly doesn't really have any of this dynamic; it's just a pillar as a creature. And creatures are susceptible to creature control, especially one this fragile.

What's wrong with this is that it does nothing to make this woebegone card more popular. With Sky Blitz, the previous Damselfly could see some action. Now, it loses even that.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: wizelsnarf on February 02, 2011, 01:40:40 am
Fine. Back on topic.

I would disagree. I like the new upgraded one.
It makes sense thematically that an insect would have no cost.
It isn't a clone of RoL because it has more health, makes  :air, and doesn't combo with Hope.
Though I'll admit this card still isn't very strong, it isn't supposed to be.
The upped one is an air pillar with 1 attack, essentially. I see nothing wrong with that.
The damselfly's stats are 1|1 in the proposed picture in the front, not 1|2.

So basically it is worse than ROL in that it can't be used for hope.




PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do not kill damselfly by changing the updated version Zanz!

It will just become cremation fodder with no other use.



Frankly the unupped version is a mixed bag too as now you won't be able to use luciferin on it. Any future cards that buff vanilla only creatures just lost 2 more applicable creatures.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: EvaRia on February 02, 2011, 01:49:29 am
I don't like this either...

If there's another card for air that gets a similar mechanic to hope, I don't mind, but as it is, this is a major nerf to an already weak card...
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: doublecross on February 02, 2011, 01:50:45 am
I think the attack of the upped should be 2. That is a good point you guys make.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: willng3 on February 02, 2011, 02:42:57 am
Honestly this card needs to go back to 2 attack.  But if that were to happen then it needs to cost 1 :air.  There, now that's a good chang- oh wait...
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Essence on February 02, 2011, 03:07:42 am
And no, for the record, I wasn't being sarcastic. I love the new Dragonfly, but the old Damselfly was MUCH better for :air than this new version is.  I understand the desire to avoid a 2-ATK creature with no cost, but honestly I'd way rather see Damselfly become 2|2 (or 3|1) Air for 1 :air than for it to be 1|1 Air for free. 
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: wizelsnarf on February 02, 2011, 03:23:53 am
And no, for the record, I wasn't being sarcastic. I love the new Dragonfly, but the old Damselfly was MUCH better for :air than this new version is.  I understand the desire to avoid a 2-ATK creature with no cost, but honestly I'd way rather see Damselfly become 2|2 (or 3|1) Air for 1 :air than for it to be 1|1 Air for free.
Agreed.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: Hyroen on February 02, 2011, 04:53:13 am
I may as well start a poll for this.


Done.

Please make sure to vote as your votes will be used to guide the next poll of this thread.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: pervepic on February 02, 2011, 07:34:22 am
Sorry, I was sleepy and accidentally voted for 1, but I meant to vote for 2  :( . I don't like nerfing already weak cards and taking away even this small synergy they had with Sky Blitz. Also, Sky Blitz should really cost less and unupped wyrms need a buff too. Time already got a normal hitter, air is somehow in bad position now.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: teffy on February 02, 2011, 01:46:34 pm
how about making the upgraded a 2/1 and keep the air production?
I think this is a good idea:
Reasons:

1) Better to rewind than a photon. If a deck uses damselfly to prevent deck out, and use it as damage, Damselfly is better than a photon. Rainbow decks normally use more  :air than  :light.
2) Potential use in a :air/ :life duo with Mitosis.  :air/ :life are good duo partners
3) Potential use with Fractal and Phase Spiders in a :aether/ :air duo with Wings.

So Damselfly could get a real role in our decks , like Ash Eater and Gnome Gemfinder.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: Falcon4415 on February 02, 2011, 02:39:03 pm
Re-thinking about it, it /needs/ to have 2 attack so that it can be used in a deck: RoL has a combo with Hope, and Gnome Gemfinder has one with Stone Skin. Dragonfly is just lame now.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: Tea is good on February 02, 2011, 05:17:36 pm
Air hath not a pumpspell nor anything that benefits from spamming creatures. (permanent wise)
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: Boingo on February 02, 2011, 07:20:13 pm
Air hath not a pumpspell nor anything that benefits from spamming creatures. (permanent wise)
Not yet, anyway.  Still, sky blitz is not cheap either.

This card buff (and the gemfinder buff) is cold comfort for the Fractal nerf.  Maybe Fire Buckler becomes more common, which wouldn't be all bad.  Still, :aether impatiently taps it foot in the corner waiting for another creature or a buff on current ones since the rest of the game seems to be passing them by...

Recent
Fractal cost increase
Skull buckler proposed buff negates reason for high cost creatures...
Mitosis (limited use on spiders?)
Overdrive (which aether creature will use this?)

Old
Thorn carapace and Fire buckler now affect immortals/phase dragons
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: zse on February 02, 2011, 07:27:18 pm
OM*G! Was Damselfly really so good that it deserves to lose 50% of it's attack? Really?!?

This nerf will ruin the card for what it was: annoying little bugger that wasn't quite worth using CC, but if left alone easily dealt dozen or more damage in a game. Attack 1 is stopped with almost every shield, and the risk of losing your quanta source compared to the damage output it potentially deals, will make this totally useless card with this nerf. Just let the Damselfly have it's 2 attack! May it cost 1 :air, 1 :rainbow or 0, I don't care, but do not nerf its attack. >:(
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27
Post by: jmdt on February 03, 2011, 01:58:52 am
NOOOO!  This is a HUGE nerf for :air !  Damselfly just went from a badass finisher w/Sky Blitz to...fodder. :(
Don't know if you were being sarcastic, but either way I agree with your statement.

This is a painful nerf to damselfly.... It basically ruins my deck http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,18220.0.html (http://Fragile Flyers)

It will probably add a turn to the TTW. Really unhappy about this.

2|1 means 8 damage per turn, with adren. That is a nice card. 1|1 is like a joke. Super vulnerable and no bite either.


I am sad this will ruin my deck :(
From a ttw standpoint, this is a huge nerf to damselfly.  Even before skyblitz, damselfly was a pro card few people knew about.  I don't like this change at all.  Damselfly was fine as is.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: willng3 on February 03, 2011, 02:04:54 am
Damselfly has been changed in the Trainer again.  Its stats are now 2|1 with no cost.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: kintar on February 03, 2011, 02:16:21 am
Damselfly has been changed in the Trainer again.  Its stats are now 2|1 with no cost.
That actually makes it worth using IMO. Air doesn't benefit much from quanta producers anyways, so being slightly stronger than the other quanta producing creatures shouldn't be a problem.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: truddy02 on February 03, 2011, 02:39:08 am
At 2|1 with no cost this card is awesome and probably bumps Powerful Wyrms ahead of destroyer rush in ttw.  I think it could be a bit much to have a free 2|1 creature with an ability but it certainly would be totally game changing.  Upped Wyrm is a useable midrange attacker on it's own but air does not have an upgraded card that has an attack 2 or more above cost like many other elements have so it would be reasonable to have a more powerful 0 cost creature than other elements.  It is still not as powerful as RoL, with it's Hope synergy so I think it would be fine to stay at these new stats.  I also would not complain if it was reverted back to original stats. 

Edit:  I just realized that destroyer rush may become faster as well using free gemfinders as cremation fodder so it may be a battle as to which gains more by these buff, Powerful Wyrms or destroyer rush.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: Essence on February 03, 2011, 03:03:10 am
F***ING SWEET.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: icybraker on February 03, 2011, 03:05:23 am
Thanks for hearing us out, Zanz ;)

This was much-needed and adds synergy to :air. I'll contribute to Damselfly statistics soon enough.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly change 1.27 [POLL]
Post by: jmdt on February 03, 2011, 03:08:22 am
At 2|1 with no cost this card is awesome and probably bumps Powerful Wyrms ahead of destroyer rush in ttw.  I think it could be a bit much to have a free 2|1 creature with an ability but it certainly would be totally game changing.  Upped Wyrm is a useable midrange attacker on it's own but air does not have an upgraded card that has an attack 2 or more above cost like many other elements have so it would be reasonable to have a more powerful 0 cost creature than other elements.  It is still not as powerful as RoL, with it's Hope synergy so I think it would be fine to stay at these new stats.  I also would not complain if it was reverted back to original stats. 

Edit:  I just realized that destroyer rush may become faster as well using free gemfinders as cremation fodder so it may be a battle as to which gains more by these buff, Powerful Wyrms or destroyer rush.
Since :air has no pumpable spell a free 2/1 card isn't that OP.  :air is a pretty agressive like :fire sans the PC, so it makes sense it should be pretty fast.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: coinich on February 03, 2011, 03:18:21 am
Mono-air is quite brutal with these, make no mistake.  Only did two battles, but ~7ttw isn't bad.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: Hyroen on February 03, 2011, 03:46:57 am
Wooo!! Our words have been heard. Removing poll as it is no longer applicable.

This poll was applicable back when the Damselfly was free to play and generated :air but was 1|1 :

(http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/361/polldamselfly.png)
Yeah I voted nerf.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: Jappert on February 03, 2011, 05:38:29 am
Yeah I am happy that Zanz is open for suggestions, you don't see this in to many games.

Everyone happy now? :D
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: Kuroaitou on February 03, 2011, 10:41:59 am
Hey! I didn't get to vote... :(

On another note though - despite its shared damage with Brimstone Eater and Ash Eater, the :fire equivalents are better served for Cremation fodder in fire-rushes and don't need to be upped to deal that 2 damage. Nonetheless, great buff indeed to the little bugger (no pun intended), and if there's a featured card article about this guy, it'll be easier to write about him (and find some decks as well). ^^;
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: silux on February 18, 2011, 06:53:35 pm
by silux
Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
Deck import code : [Select]
6rr 6rr 6rr 6rr 6rr 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mt 7mu 7mu 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n9 7n9 7n9 7n9 8pr


This deck uses damselfly and it's pretty good!6 turns to win against lvl3!

Hooray for damselfly!
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: karis on February 26, 2011, 08:22:12 pm
and what about brimstone eater?  (1 fire cost   2/1  and no airborne)


Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: jmdt on February 26, 2011, 08:29:51 pm
and what about brimstone eater?  (1 fire cost   2/1  and no airborne)
Then every :fire stall packs 6 and becomes faster.  No thanks.
Title: Re: Dragonfly | Damselfly
Post by: TheIdioticIdiot on February 26, 2011, 08:43:19 pm
this card and gnome are hardly ever seen, brimstone is seen rather often
blarg: silux