Air [Ninja Series]

[ninjaclone09]

by ninjaclone09

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oe 5oe 5oe 5oe 5of 5of 5of 5of 5og 5og 5ol 5op 5op 5op 8pr

I got 40 wins and 10 losses in pvp 1 with this deck.

Gravity can be annoying because of momentum ignoring your fog shield and otyughs eating your wyrms.

Strategy is simple. wyrms and dragons for damage, fog shield because of its effect, owls eye for creature control, sky blitz to make your creatures stronger.

and of course, constructive criticism would be appreciated. thanks guys


link to rest of ninja series:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,33456.0.html

[ralouf]

Looks not bad but you have ton of air pillar. I wonder if you can take out some of them for damsefly, okay this will make the deck more weak against cc but damsefly can deal damage and gain sky blitz boost too.

[oblivion1212]

why not add the omg-awesome-but-weirdly-underrated wings?

in pvp1, it might work, especially for those who go pillar-CC-PC-less-immo-rushing-like-a-boss

there are a lot of creatures that aren't airborne, plus only two weapons are ranged..

[ralouf]

And only one weapon is used. Wings is very good for graboids rush. I never play pvp1 and so i don't know if there are a lot of graboids here but if it is the case you can and should play 3/4 wings.

[furballdn]

I feel you can add some shockwaves for CC.

[puri1]

Shouldn't you stick with Dragons? Maybe -2 Wyrms, +2 Dragons since the cost of upkeep of unupped Wyrms' ability  will make them a liability to bringing out dragons. With an additional (presumably) 2 quanta drain each turn from your Owl's Eye you want enough quanta to bring out the big guns. More importantly, the draining effect of Blitz means that unless you have enough pillars out beforehand you probably won't be able to dive some of your Wyrms the next turn. Wyrms are also significantly more susceptible to CC. Overall a decent mono-air, but Wyrms don't work well without any buffs (e.g. Blessing).

[regen2k9]

why not add the omg-awesome-but-weirdly-underrated wings?

in pvp1, it might work, especially for those who go pillar-CC-PC-less-immo-rushing-like-a-boss

there are a lot of creatures that aren't airborne, plus only two weapons are ranged..

I like the wings idea.

If you do add wings, I would suggest adding in CC (shockwave) too in order to take out flying creatures in the event that an opponent has a mainly flying deck.  Something to keep in mind is that 2 shockwaves are required to take out most dragons though.  However, I don't think that shockwave is as necessary if you stick with fog shield.

[ninjaclone09]

just so ya know guys i did think about putting in 2 wings instead of fog shields, i just liked fog shield better

[Zarj]

You have a good deck there, but I feel as if your deck is weak to CC (this means Creature Control, right? Sorry, n00b here ). Against a good CC deck, you'll pretty much loose. As for your shield card, I prefer Wings over Fog Shield every time. It is such an underrated card, but I love it. The only problems I have with Wings are Momentum effects, Dragon Cards, and Air decks. However, with a good CC deck, you could minimize these problems. I suggest adding some Shockwave or Owl's Eyes cards. But wait, there is MORE! I would get rid of Blitz. I hate that card with a passion. It's such a quanta drainer. I'd get rid of those cards and replace them with creatures and/or CC cards. That's just me though.